45°反角涡轮钻改良拔除术在下颌阻生第三磨牙中的应用效果评价

中国口腔颌面外科杂志 ›› 2016, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (6): 542-544.

45°反角涡轮钻改良拔除术在下颌阻生第三磨牙中的应用效果评价

张洁, 沈国华, 吕翔, 王晓英, 李春艳

中国石油天然气集团公司中心医院口腔科,河北廊坊 065000

出版日期:2016-11-20 发布日期:2016-12-05
通讯作者: 沈国华,E-mail:Sghlf@sina.com
作者简介:张洁（1973-）,女,主治医师, E-mail:13603364432@139.com

Evaluation of the clinical effects of 45 degree turbine drill in 64 patients with lower horizontally impacted mandibular third molar

ZHANG Jie, SHEN Guo-hua, LV Xiang, WANG Xiao-ying, LI Chun-yan

Department of Stomatology, China National Petroleum Corporation Center Hospital. Langfang 065000, Hebei Province, China

Online:2016-11-20 Published:2016-12-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的评析低位水平下颌阻生第三磨牙应用45°涡轮钻改良拔除术治疗的临床效果。方法选择64例下颌低位水平阻生第三磨牙患者,依据随机双盲法平均分为2组,其中对照组施以传统三角瓣法和高速涡轮钻拔除;实验组则采取涡轮钻彻底分牙法配合三角切龈拔除第三磨牙。比较2组患者手术时间、术后并发症的差异,采用SPSS20.0软件包对数据进行统计学处理。结果实验组患者的手术时间显著低于对照组（P<0.05）,术后疼痛、肿胀、牙龈撕裂、干槽症与开口受限程度显著轻于对照组（P<0.05）,而2组的术后出血发生率无显著差异（P>0.05）。结论低位下颌水平阻生第三磨牙应用45°反角涡轮钻采用彻底分牙法配合三角切龈拔除,具有手术时间短,术后疼痛、肿胀、牙龈撕裂、干槽症以及开口受限发生率低等优势,相对传统涡轮钻拔牙法疗效可靠,值得临床推广。

关键词: 阻生第三磨牙, 45°, 反角涡轮钻, 阻生牙拔除术

Abstract: PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical usefulness of 45 degree turbine drill in the extraction of lower horizontally impacted mandibular third molar. METHODS: Sixty-four patients with lower horizontally impacted mandibular third molar were randomly divided into 2 groups (n=32). The control group underwent extraction with the traditional method of triangular flap and high speed turbine drill, while in the experimental group, the impacted tooth was completely divided with triangular gingival cutting to pull out the third molars. The surgical time and postoperative complications were recorded and compared using SPSS 20.0 software package. RESULTS: The operation time of the experimental group was significantly shorter than that of the control group (P<0.05), pain, swelling, alveolalgia and limitation of mouth opening were significantly lower than the control group (P<0.05), postoperative bleeding was similar in 2 groups (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Dividing the impacted teeth completely with triangular gingival cutting is an effective method for extraction of lower horizontally impacted mandibular third molar. It can shorten the operation time, lessen postoperative pain, swelling, gum tearing, alveolalgia and limitation of mouth opening; it is safe and reliable and worth of wide clinical application.

Key words: Impacted third molar, 45 degree turbine drill, Extraction of impacted tooth

中图分类号:

R782.11

张洁, 沈国华, 吕翔, 王晓英, 李春艳. 45°反角涡轮钻改良拔除术在下颌阻生第三磨牙中的应用效果评价[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2016, 14(6): 542-544.

ZHANG Jie, SHEN Guo-hua, LV Xiang, WANG Xiao-ying, LI Chun-yan. Evaluation of the clinical effects of 45 degree turbine drill in 64 patients with lower horizontally impacted mandibular third molar[J]. China J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2016, 14(6): 542-544.

参考文献

[1] 蔡勇涛, 罗顺云, 李旭艳. 45°涡轮钻在第三磨牙拔除术中的改良应用 [J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2013, 40(5): 577-579.
[2] 袁苏健, 黄晓菲. 高速涡轮牙钻法拔除下颌阻生第三磨牙的临床疗效观察 [J].临床和实验医学杂志, 2013, 12(11): 892-893.
[3] Renton T, Hankins M, Sproate C, et al. A randomised controlled clinical trial to compare the incidence of injury to the inferior alveolar nerve as a result of coronectomy and removal of mandibular third molars [J]. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2005, 43(4): 7-12.
[4] 曹发明, 王小平, 马腾飞, 等. 反角涡轮钻在下颌地位水平阻生牙拔除中的改良应用初步探讨 [J].齐齐哈尔医学院学报, 2014, 35(14): 2057-2059.
[5] 李传祝. 2种方法拔除下颌第三磨牙的疗效比较 [J]. 口腔医学, 2014, 34(10): 781-783.
[6] 赵守德, 李静平, 孙萍. 高速涡轮牙钻去阻力拔除下颌中低位阻生智齿158 例临床报告 [J]. 临床口腔医学杂志, 2010, 26(4): 236-237.
[7] 罗薇, 杨秩, 赖文丽. 视觉模拟评分法评价多个临床因素对正畸初始疼痛的影响[J]. 实用口腔医学杂志, 2007, 23(6): 867-870.
[8] Voegelin TC, Suter VG, Bornstein MM. Complications during and after surgical removal of mandibular third molars. Impact of patient related and anatomical factors [J]. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed, 2008, 118(3): 192-198.
[9] 高晓蔚, 陈曼丽, 刘瑛. 应用微创拔牙术拔除下颌阻生第三磨牙的临床试验 [J]. 新疆医科大学学报, 2012, 35(4): 517-519.
[10] 李文超, 阮宁. 2种方法在下颌水平阻生第三磨牙拔除中的比较 [J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2010, 28(1): 71-73.
[11] Chukwuneke FN, Oji C, Saheeb DB. A comparative study of the effect of using a rubber drain on postoperative discomfort following lower third molar surgery [J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2008, 37(4): 341-344.
[12] Stubinger S, von Rechenberg vB, Zeilhofer HF, et al. Er:YAG laser osteotomy for removal of impacted teeth: clinical comparison of two techniques [J]. Lasers Surg Med, 2007, 39(7): 583-588.
[13] Kirtiloglu T, Bulut E, Sümer M, et al. Comparison of 2 flap designs in the periodontal healing of second molars after fully impacted mandibular third molar extractions [J].J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2007, 65(11): 2206-2210.
[14] 刘鹏, 赵枫, 袁伟, 等. 2种方法在拔除下颌阻生第三磨牙中的疗效比较 [J].中国美容学, 2013, 22(3): 379-381.
[15] 宋娟, 毕小琴. 应用反转式高速涡轮机拔除下颌前倾阻生第三磨牙的护理初探 [J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2012, 30(4): 396-398.