hOPG基因转染对种植体周围骨再生的影响

中国口腔颌面外科杂志 ›› 2016, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (1): 1-7.

• 论著 • 下一篇

hOPG基因转染对种植体周围骨再生的影响

李佳洋，尹国柱，孙玥，陈贵征，纪焕中，罗恩

四川大学华西口腔医学院·口腔疾病研究国家重点实验室,四川成都 610041

收稿日期:2015-05-06 出版日期:2016-01-20 发布日期:2016-02-01
通讯作者: 罗恩,Tel:028-85502334, E-mail:luoen521125@sina.com
作者简介:李佳洋（1993-）,女,口腔医学8年制学生,E-mail:1553205723@qq.com
基金资助:
四川省科技厅科技支撑计划（2015SZ0127,2014SZ0019-4）

Enhanced osteogenesis in peri-implant through local hOPG transfection

LI Jia-yang, YIN Guo-zhu, SUN Yue, CHEN Gui-zhen, JI Huan-zhong, LUO En

West China Hospital of Stomatology, State Key Laboratory of Oral Disease, Sichuan University. Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China

Received:2015-05-06 Online:2016-01-20 Published:2016-02-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的研究局部稳定表达OPG在种植体周围骨再生修复过程中的作用。方法将66只SD大鼠随机分为3组,A组种植体周围注射腺病毒Ad5-OPG-EGFP,B组种植体周围注射腺病毒Ad5-EGFP,C组种植体周围注射相同体积的PBS。在植入手术后1周、4周处死动物,行RT-PCR、组织学观察和Micro-CT扫描等检测,采用SPSS15.0软件包对相关数据进行t检验。结果实验组hOPG表达量显著高于对照组(P<0.05),证实重组腺病毒载体Ad5-OPG-EGFP建模成功,可顺利转染到骨组织中并稳定表达。植入术后4周,实验组和对照B组和C组大鼠均有新骨形成、包绕种植体。A组骨面积百分比(%BIC)、骨结合百分比(%BA)、标化后骨体积(BV/TV)、骨结合率(%OI)、单位体积内骨小梁数量(Tb.N)、单位体积内骨小梁厚度(Tb.Th)、骨小梁连接密度(Conn.D)均显著高于B组和C组(P<0.05),单位体积内骨小梁间隔(Tb.Sp)则显著低于B组和C组。结论 hOPG基因转染可在种植体周围稳定表达OPG,加快骨质再生,使种植体骨结合率增加。

关键词: 种植体, 腺病毒, 骨保护素, 骨结合

Abstract: PURPOSE : To study the role of local stable expression of OPG in peri-implant in bone regeneration during repair process. METHODS : Sixty-six SD rats were divided into A, B and C group randomly. In group A, adenovirus-hOPG-EGFP was injected around the implant; in group B, adenovirus-EGFP was injected around the implant; in group C, same volume of PBS was injected in the periphery of implant. The animals were sacrificed 1 week, 4 weeks after operation, and the femur bone containing the implant was collected. Micro-CT, H-E staining, toluidine blue staining were used to observe new bone formation. The data was analyzed with SPSS 15.0 software package. RESULTS : A successful vector of reconstructed adenovirus- OPG-GFP as gene therapy was established. In vitro the GFP was successfully expressed in the BMSCs of SD rats. At 4 weeks after implant surgery, osteointegration was observed in all groups. However, % BIC, % bone area, BV/TV, % OI, Tb.N, Tb.Th, Conn.D in the peri-implant area in group A significantly increased compared with the control group (B and C)(P<0.05). Tb.Sp was also significantly less in experimental group (A) than that in control group (B and C). CONCLUSIONS : Local hOPG transfection can be successfully conducted, and the stable expression of protein OPG in peri-implant area can remarkably promote osteogenesis.

Key words: Implant, Adenovirus, Osteoprotegerin, Osteointegration

中图分类号:

R782.1

李佳洋，尹国柱，孙玥，陈贵征，纪焕中，罗恩. hOPG基因转染对种植体周围骨再生的影响[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2016, 14(1): 1-7.

LI Jia-yang, YIN Guo-zhu, SUN Yue, CHEN Gui-zhen, JI Huan-zhong, LUO En. Enhanced osteogenesis in peri-implant through local hOPG transfection[J]. China J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2016, 14(1): 1-7.

参考文献

[1] Nakagawa N, Kinosaki M, Yamaguchi K, et al. RANK is the essential signaling receptor for osteoclast differentiation factor in osteoclastogenesis[J]. Biochem Biophys Res Commun,1998,253(2): 395-400.
[2] Gori F, Hofbauer LC, Dunstan CR, et al. The expression of osteoprotegerin and RANK ligand and the support of osteoclast formation by stromal-osteoblast lineage cells is developmentally regulated [J].Endocrinology,2000,141(12): 4768-4776.
[3] Kostenuik PJ, Shalhoub V. Osteoprotegerin: a physiological and pharmacological inhibitor of bone resorption [J].Curr Pharm Des, 2001, 7(8): 613-635.
[4] Pedrosa WF Jr, Okamoto R, Faria PE, et al. Immunohistochemical, tomographic and histological study on onlay bone graft remodeling. Part II: calvarial bone [J].Clin Oral Implants Res,2009, 20(11): 1254-1264.
[5] Baud'huin M, Lamoureux F, Duplomb L, et al. RANKL, RANK, osteoprotegerin: key partners of osteoimunology and vascular diseases [J].Cell Mol Life Sci,2007, 64(18): 2334-2350.
[6] Fekete DM, CePko CL. Replication-competent retroviral vectors eneoding alkaline phosphatase reveal spatial restriction of viral gene expression/transduction in the chick embryo [J].Mol Cell Bio,1993,13(4):2604-2613.
[7] Louis JP. Fibrous carbon implants for the maintenance of bone volume after tooth avulsion: first clinical results [J].Biomaterials,1990,11(9): 525-528.
[8] Fujimoto T, Niimi A, Nakai H, et al. Osseointegrated implants in a patient with osteoporosis: a case report [J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants,1996, 11(4): 539-542.
[9] Ellingsen JE, Johansson CB, Wennerberg A, et al. Improved retention and bone-to-implant contact with fluoride-modified titanium implants [J].Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2004, 19(5): 659-666.
[10] Buser D, Broggini N, Wieland M, et al. Enhanced bone apposition to a chemically modified SLA titanium surface [J].J Dent Res, 2004, 83(7): 529-533.
[11] Coelho PG, Suzuki M. Evaluation of an IBAD thin-film process as an alternative method for surface incorporation of bioceramics on dental implants: a study in dogs[J].J Appl Oral Sci 2005,13(1):87-92.
[12] Kasemo B. Biocompatibility of titanium implants: surface science aspects [J].J Prosthet Dent, 1983,49(6):832-837.
[13] Nanci A, Wuest JD, Peru L, et al. Chemical modification of titanium surfaces for covalent attachment of biological molecules [J].J Biomed Mater Res, 1998, 40(2): 324-335.
[14] Buser D, Schenk RK, Steinemann S, et al. Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs[J]. J Biomed Mater Res, 1991, 25(7): 889-902.
[15] Ogawa T, Nishimura I. Different bone integration profiles of turned and acidetched implants associated with modulated expression of extracellular matrix genes [J].Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2003,18(2): 200-210.
[16] Takayanagi H, Ogasawara K, Hida S, et al. T-cell mediated regulation of osteoclastogenesis by signalling cross-talk between RANKL and IFN-gamma [J].Nature, 2000, 408(6812): 600-605.
[17] Simonet WS, Lacey DL, Dunstan CR, et al. Osteoprotegerin: a novel secreted protein involved in the regulation of bone density [J].Cell, 1997, 89(2): 309-319.
[18] Wooley PH, Schwarz EM. Aseptic loosening [J].Gene Ther, 2004,11(4): 402-407.
[19] Kofron MD, Laurencin CT. Bone tissue engineering by gene delivery [J].Adv Drug Deliv Rev, 2006,58(4):555-576.

hOPG基因转染对种植体周围骨再生的影响

Enhanced osteogenesis in peri-implant through local hOPG transfection

RichHTML

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	孙祎昕, 祝颂松, 姜楠. 微纳米磷酸钛涂层促进钛植入体骨结合的实验研究[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2023, 21(2): 112-118.
[2]	兰嵘, 阮敏, 韩楠男, 王凤. 左下种植修复后发生植体周围鳞状细胞癌1例报告[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2023, 21(2): 203-205.
[3]	宋昊天, 洪多, 瞿晓辉. 末端游离单颗种植体远期骨吸收量回顾性分析[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2023, 21(1): 55-58.
[4]	胡颖恺, 邹多宏, 杨驰. 超声骨刀分段截骨结合软组织增量治疗下前牙错位种植体1例报告[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2022, 20(6): 612-617.
[5]	顾雨薇, 王凤, 黄伟, 张志勇, 张陈平, 孙坚, 吴轶群. 种植联合血管化髂骨移植重建14例下颌骨缺损的长期疗效观察[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2022, 20(5): 422-428.
[6]	顾雨薇, 王凤, 黄伟, 张志勇, 张陈平, 孙坚, 吴轶群. 种植联合血管化髂骨移植重建14例下颌骨缺损的长期疗效观察[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2022, 20(5): 488-493.
[7]	薛秋波, 薛陆峰, 马成, 丁皓月. 口腔种植体周围炎患者牙龈中组织蛋白酶B及Beclin-1的表达及临床意义[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2022, 20(3): 251-256.
[8]	马捷, 王齐帅, 张兵华, 陈天天, 蔡国平, 宋涛. 口腔种植体-基台微间隙充填对种植修复系统及周围骨力学的影响[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2022, 20(2): 117-122.
[9]	孙丹丹, 石飒飒, 尹伟娇. 78例氧化锆种植体边缘骨吸收5年随访观察[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2022, 20(2): 168-172.
[10]	王慧丽, 谢冰, 魏育红. 外源性bFGF对2型糖尿病大鼠钛种植体骨结合的影响及机制探讨[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2022, 20(1): 22-27.
[11]	张楚南, 赵旭, 乔士冲, 张晓梦, 顾迎新. 拔牙窝内植入不同深度骨水平种植体周围软硬组织改建的组织形态变化[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2021, 19(3): 193-196.
[12]	杨路鹏, 樊林峰, 史俊宇, 张枭, 顾迎新, 张楚南. 磨牙区使用角度螺丝一体冠不同全瓷材料修复种植单冠：1年前瞻性半口自身对照研究[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2021, 19(3): 222-225.
[13]	郭苏伟, 王蕻雁, 赵祥鹤. 下颌覆盖义齿短微型种植体与标准长度微型种植体效果比较[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2021, 19(3): 253-257.
[14]	郭苏伟, 王蕻雁, 赵祥鹤. 下颌覆盖义齿短微型种植体与标准长度微型种植体效果比较[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2021, 19(3): 253-257.
[15]	居云梦, 吴娜, 宁波, 杨芳, 陈正岗, 郭大伟. 种植体倾斜植入用于上颌后牙区骨量不足患者的效果评价[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2020, 18(1): 17-21.