新型双层骨引导再生壳聚糖膜修复大鼠颅骨缺损的实验研究

中国口腔颌面外科杂志 ›› 2015, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (2): 97-104.

• 基础研究 • 下一篇

新型双层骨引导再生壳聚糖膜修复大鼠颅骨缺损的实验研究

陈琦¹, 万光勇^{2, *}, 张善勇^{3, *}, 焦子先³

1.潍坊医学院口腔医学院,山东潍坊 261000;
2.泰安市中心医院口腔科,山东泰安 271000;
3.上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院·口腔医学院口腔外科,上海市口腔医学重点实验室,上海 200011

收稿日期:2014-10-13 修回日期:2014-11-24 出版日期:2015-03-20 发布日期:2015-04-23
通讯作者: 万光勇,E-mail: wgykq@163.com;张善勇,E-mail: zhangshanyong@126.com。*共同通信作者
作者简介:陈琦（1989-）,男,在读硕士研究生,E-mail：chenqill@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（81371168）; 上海市科学技术委员会西医引导类项目(134119a5400)

An experimental study of a novel double-layer chitosan membrane for guided bone regeneration in rat calvarial defects

CHEN Qi¹, WAN Guang-yong², ZHANG Shan-yong³, JIAO Zi-xian³

1. College of Stomatology, Weifang Medical University. Weifang 26100, Shandong Province;
2. Department of Stomatology, Tai’an Central Hospital. Tai’an 271000, Shandong Province;
3. Department of Oral Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology. Shanghai 200011, China

Received:2014-10-13 Revised:2014-11-24 Online:2015-03-20 Published:2015-04-23
Supported by:
Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (81371168) and Western Medicine Guide Project of Science and Technology Committee of Shanghai Municipality (134119a5400)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的: 通过比较新型双层壳聚糖膜和Bio-Gide膜对大鼠颅骨缺损的修复效果,评估其作为引导骨再生膜的可行性。方法: 双层壳聚糖膜与MC3T3-E1细胞共培养,应用扫描电子显微镜（scanning electron microscope,SEM）观察细胞对膜的黏附效果;采用cell counting kit-8（CCK-8）法在3、7和10 d检测膜的细胞毒性;选择18只Sprague-Dawley（SD）大鼠,随机分为A、B、C组,在其颅骨中线两侧制作5 mm的极量骨缺损,左侧为实验侧,覆盖双层壳聚糖膜,右侧为对照侧覆盖Bio-Gide膜,分别于术后第2、4及8周时处死各组大鼠,通过大体观察、微计算机体层扫描技术（micro-computed tomography,micro-CT）及组织学方法,评价2种膜修复骨缺损的效果。采用SPSS20.0软件包对结果进行统计学分析。结果: 通过MC3T3-E1细胞在双层壳聚糖膜上培养2 d后的扫描电镜照片,观察到细胞较好地粘附于多孔层上。第3、7及10天时,实验组细胞相对增殖率分别为114.49%、107.17%和98.73%,细胞毒性级别为0或1级,表明膜的细胞毒性轻微。2周时,Bio-Gide膜组的骨形成量（BV）和骨体积分数（BVF、BV/TV）与实验组差异显著（P<0.05）;但在第4和8周时,2组的BV和BVF无显著差异（P>0.05）。结论: 新型双层壳聚糖的体外和体内生物学性能符合GBR技术的要求,具有作为GBR膜的潜力。

关键词: 壳聚糖膜, 胶原膜, 生物材料, 骨缺损, 引导骨再生, 微计算机断层扫描技术, 颅骨缺损, 大鼠

Abstract: PURPOSE: To compare new bone formation in rat calvarial defects using novel double-layer chitosan membranes (DLCM) or collagen (Bio-Gide) membranes, and evaluate the feasibility as guided bone regeneration (GBR) membrane. METHODS: The MC3T3-E1 cells were cultured on the DLCM for 2 days, then SEM was used to observe the attachment of the cell line to the membrane. The cytotoxicity of the DLCM was tested by CCK-8 assay at day 3, 7 and 10. Eighteen (18)SD rats were selected, and then divided into 3 groups (A,B and C). Two calvarial critical-sized defects (CSDs), 5 mm in diameter, were created symmetrically on the bilateral sides of the midline using a trephine bur. Right defect was covered with a resorbable collagen membrane (Bio-Gide) as a control and the left side was covered with DLCM. The rats were sacrificed 2, 4 and 8 weeks after surgery. The specimens were then analysed using micro-CT and histological methods,to compare new bone formation in rat calvarial defects using the two membranes. The data was analyzed for Student’s t test with SPSS20.0 software package. RESULTS: From the SEM image of MC3T3-E1 cells on the double-layer chitosan membrane after being cultured for 2 days. It was found that the cells adhered well to the porous layer. The results of cytotoxicity showed that cell proliferation rates of the experimental groups were 114.49%, 107.17% and 98.73% at day 3,7 and10, respectively, while the cytotoxicity was in grade 0 or 1, indicating that the chitosan membrane had low cytotoxicity. At 2 week, there were significant differences in bone volume (BV) and bone volume/total volume (BVF, BV/TV) (P<0.05) between the collagen group and the chitosan membrane group. But at 4 and 8 week, there was no significant difference in BV and BVF (P>0.05) between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study indicated that the in vitro and in vivo bioactivities of the novel chitosan membrane fulfilled the requirements for GBR, and has significant potential as a GBR membrane.

Key words: Chitosan membrane, Collagen membrane, Biomaterials, Bone defect, Guided bone regeneration, Micro-computed tomography, Calvarial defect, Rat

中图分类号:

R782.1

陈琦, 万光勇, 张善勇, 焦子先. 新型双层骨引导再生壳聚糖膜修复大鼠颅骨缺损的实验研究[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2015, 13(2): 97-104.

CHEN Qi, WAN Guang-yong, ZHANG Shan-yong, JIAO Zi-xian. An experimental study of a novel double-layer chitosan membrane for guided bone regeneration in rat calvarial defects[J]. China J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2015, 13(2): 97-104.

参考文献

[1] Chiapasco M, Zaniboni M. Clinical outcomes of GBR procedures to correct peri-implant dehiscences and fenestrations: a systematic review [J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2009, 20( Suppl 4): 113-123.
[2] Mhawi AA, Peel SA, Fok TC, et al. Bone regeneration in athymic calvarial defects with accell DBM100 [J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2007, 18(3): 497-503.
[3] Kim HS, Kim JT, Jung YJ, et al. Preparation of a porous chitosan/fibroin-hydroxyapatite composite matrix for tissue engineering [J]. Macromol Res, 2007, 15(1): 65-73.
[4] Piehler J, Brecht A, Geckeler KE, et al. Surface modification for direct immunoprobes [J]. Biosens Bioelectron, 1996, 11(6-7): 579-590.
[5] Costa-Pinto AR, Correlo VM, Sol PC, et al. Osteogenic differentiation of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells seeded on melt based chitosan scaffolds for bone tissue engineering applications [J]. Biomacromolecules, 2009, 10(8): 2067-2073.
[6] Ueyama Y, Ishikawa K, Mano T, et al. Usefulness as guided bone regeneration membrane of the alginate membrane [J]. Biomaterials, 2002, 23(9): 2027-2033.
[7] Ignatius AA, Ohnmacht M, Claes LE, et al. A composite polymer/tricalcium phosphate membrane for guided bone regeneration in maxillofacial surgery[J]. J Biomed Mater Res,2001,58(5):564-569.
[8] Kuo SM, Chang SJ, Chen TW, et al. Guided tissue regeneration for using a chitosan membrane: an experimental study in rats [J]. J Biomed Mater Res A, 2006, 76(2): 408-415.
[9] Park YJ, Kim KH, Lee JY, et al. Immobilization of bone morphogenetic protein-2 on a nanofibrous chitosan membrane for enhanced guided bone regeneration [J]. Biotechnol Appl Biochem, 2006, 43(Pt 1): 17-24.
[10] Jung UW, Song KY, Kim CS, et al. Effects of a chitosan membrane coated with polylactic and polyglycolic acid on bone regeneration in a rat calvarial defect[J]. Biomed Mater,2007,2(3): S101.
[11] GB/T 16886.5-2003, 医疗器械生物学评价第5部分：体外细胞毒性试验 [S].
[12] 严晓东, 毛钊, 唐成忠, 等. 引导骨再生术对美学区种植体周软组织的影响 [J]. 医学研究生学报, 2012, 25(1): 47-50.
[13] 朱一博, 邱立新, 吴茴, 等. 应用骨胶原及富血小板纤维蛋白保存牙槽嵴 [J]. 实用口腔医学杂志, 2014, 30(1): 70-73.
[14] Song JH, Kim HE, Kim HW. Collagen-apatite nanocomposite membranes for guided bone regeneration [J]. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 2007, 83(1): 248-257.
[15] Dupoirieux L, Pourquier D, Picot MC, et al. Comparative study of three different membranes for guided bone regeneration of rat cranial defects[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2001, 30(1): 58-62.
[16] Kozlovsky A, Aboodi G, Moses O, et al. Bio-degradation of a resorbable collagen membrane (Bio-Gides) applied in a double-layer technique in rats [J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2009, 20(10): 1116-1123.
[17] Song JM, Shin SH, Kim YD, et al. Comparative study of chitosan/fibroin-hydroxyapatite and collagen membranes for guided bone regeneration in rat calvarial defects: micro-computed tomography analysis [J]. Int J Oral Sci, 2014, 6(2): 87-93.
[18] Lahiji A, Sohrabi A, Hungerford DS, et al. Chitosan supports the expression of extracellular matrix proteins in human osteoblasts and chondrocytes [J]. J Biomed Mater Res, 2000, 51(4): 586-595.
[19] VandeVord PJ, Matthew HW, DeSilva SP, et al. Evaluation of the biocompatibility of a chitosan scaffold in mice [J]. J Biomed Mater Res, 2002, 59(3): 585-590.
[20] Teng SH, Lee EJ, Wang P, et al. Three-layered membranes of collagen/hydroxyapatite and chitosan for guided bone regeneration[J]. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 2008, 87(1): 132-138.
[21] Taguchi Y, Amizuka N, Nakadate M, et al. A histological evaluation for guided bone regeneration induced by a collagenous membrane [J]. Biomaterials, 2005, 26(31): 6158-6166.
[22] Liao S, Wang W, Uo M, et al. A three-layered nano-carbonated hydroxyapatite/collagen/ PLGA composite membrane for guided tissue regeneration [J]. Biomaterials, 2005, 26(36): 7564-7571.
[23] Ueno H, Yamada H, Tanaka I, et al. Accelerating effects of chitosan for healing at early phase of experimental open wound in dogs [J]. Biomaterials, 1999, 20(15): 1407-1414.
[24] Kratz G, Arnander C, Swedenborg J, et al. Heparin chitosan complexes stimulate wound healing in human skin[J]. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg, 1997, 31(2): 119-123.
[25] Wang J, de Boer J, de Groot K. Proliferation and differentiation of MC3T3-E1 cells on calcium phosphate/chitosan coatings [J]. J Dent Res, 2008, 87(7): 650-654.
[26] 金黎明, 魏长征, 田文杰, 等. 壳寡糖及其衍生物对体外培养成骨细胞增殖的作用特点[J]. 中国组织工程研究与临床康复, 2008, 12(19): 3637-3640.
[27] Coimbra P, Ferreira P, de Sousa HC, et al. Preparation and chemical and biological characterization of a pectin/chitosan polyelectrolyte complex scaffold for possible bone tissue engineering applications[J]. Int J Biological Macromol,2011,48(1): 112-118.
[28] Bhattarai N, Edmondson D, Veiseh O, et al. Electrospun chitosan-based nanofibers and their cellular compatibility [J]. Biomaterials, 2005, 26(31): 6176-6184.
[29] Blanquaert F, Saffar JL, Colombier ML, et al. Heparan-like molecules induce the repair of skull defects[J].Bone, 1995, 17(6): 499-506.
[30] 尹宏宇, 崔磊, 曹谊林. 大鼠颅骨缺损模型在骨组织工程中的应用 [J]. 中国美容医学, 2009, 18(5): 727-729.
[31] Kuo SM, Chang SJ, Chen TW, et al. Guided tissue regeneration for using a chitosan membrane: an experimental study in rats [J]. J Biomed Mater Res Part A, 2006, 76(2): 408-415.
[32] Lee EJ, Shin DS, Kim HE, et al. Membrane of hybrid chitosan-silica xerogel for guided bone regeneration [J].Biomaterials, 2009, 30(5): 743-750.

新型双层骨引导再生壳聚糖膜修复大鼠颅骨缺损的实验研究

An experimental study of a novel double-layer chitosan membrane for guided bone regeneration in rat calvarial defects

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	寻兴祥, 孙伟, 王荷静, 楚晨, 赵谦, 许晓, 袁荣涛. 用于颌骨缺损修复的可注射多功能脂质体-水凝胶复合体的构建及体外评价[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2022, 20(6): 534-540.
[2]	顾雨薇, 王凤, 黄伟, 张志勇, 张陈平, 孙坚, 吴轶群. 种植联合血管化髂骨移植重建14例下颌骨缺损的长期疗效观察[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2022, 20(5): 422-428.
[3]	顾雨薇, 王凤, 黄伟, 张志勇, 张陈平, 孙坚, 吴轶群. 种植联合血管化髂骨移植重建14例下颌骨缺损的长期疗效观察[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2022, 20(5): 488-493.
[4]	王博, 于洪波, 夏韫晖, 房兵, 郭秋曼. 牙槽骨再生正畸技术治疗成人错畸形伴原发性牙槽骨缺损的远期疗效评价[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2022, 20(3): 225-229.
[5]	李慧萍, 刘秀明, 徐伟峰, 甄锦泽, 沈达, 张善勇. 环肌酸抑制大鼠牙周炎周围牙槽骨吸收的实验研究[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2022, 20(2): 111-116.
[6]	李晶, 梅东梅, 姜雅萍, 徐昊, 王文雪, 姚晨阳, 李亚男, 赵保东. 2 mm矮愈合基台在前牙美学区早期种植骨增量中的效果分析[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2021, 19(6): 531-535.
[7]	费晨艳, 江银华. 生长因子在牙槽骨组织再生中的应用与研究进展[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2021, 19(6): 568-572.
[8]	杨宗燕, 康一帆, 吕晓鸣, 张雷, 单小峰, 蔡志刚. 血管化髂骨瓣重建下颌骨有牙区缺损时髂骨嵴不同朝向的优缺点比较[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2021, 19(5): 434-438.
[9]	郭亚荣, 卢旭光, 王兴, 程永峰, 何东宁. 去端肽胶原修复下颌第三磨牙拔除后邻牙远中骨缺损的自身对照研究[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2021, 19(4): 332-336.
[10]	邹多宏, 刘昌奎, 薛洋, 胡开进, 杨驰, 张志愿. 帐篷钉技术在牙槽骨修复与再生中的临床应用及操作规范[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2021, 19(1): 1-5.
[11]	王友元, 刘志新, 朱川东, 周斌, 袁开放, 汪延, 杨朝晖, 陈伟良. 面动脉-颏下动脉岛状瓣修复65例腭癌术后BrownⅡ类缺损的疗效评价[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2020, 18(5): 434-437.
[12]	林钊宇, 周斌, 陈伟良, 汪延, 陈睿, 钟江龙. 斜方肌肌皮瓣联合肩胛骨肌皮瓣修复晚期头颈肿瘤术后下颌骨贯穿性缺损6例报道[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2020, 18(5): 447-450.
[13]	李晨琳, 谢千阳, 徐光宙, 蒋倩. 下颌阻生第三磨牙拔除术后邻牙远中骨缺损的CBCT评价[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2020, 18(4): 314-318.
[14]	王明一, 傅振, 张陈平. 血管化腓骨重建下颌骨后用腓骨残端游离移植及牙种植的可行性研究[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2020, 18(4): 338-342.
[15]	支音, 郁爽, 沈洪洲, 司家文, 袁媛, 史俊, 刘昌胜. PEGS/β-TCP屏障膜在促进大鼠颅骨缺损骨组织再生中的作用[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2020, 18(3): 219-225.