上皮癌来源细胞外囊泡亚群蛋白质谱分析

doi:10.19438/j.cjoms.2023.04.002

中国口腔颌面外科杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (4): 326-331.doi: 10.19438/j.cjoms.2023.04.002

上皮癌来源细胞外囊泡亚群蛋白质谱分析

吴若怡¹, 王晓宁², 翟培淞¹, 张建军^1,*, 陈万涛^1,*

1.上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院口腔颌面-头颈肿瘤科,2.口腔病理科,上海交通大学口腔医学院,国家口腔医学中心,国家口腔疾病临床医学研究中心,上海市口腔医学重点实验室,上海市口腔医学研究所,上海 200011

收稿日期:2023-02-07 修回日期:2023-03-27 出版日期:2023-07-20 发布日期:2023-08-16
通讯作者: 张建军,E-mail: zjjshuobo@163.com;陈万涛,E-mail: chenwantao196323@sjtu.edu.cn。^*共同通信作者
作者简介:吴若怡（1997-）,女,硕士研究生,E-mail: wuruoyimiki@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金重点项目（82230090）; 上海地方高水平大学创新团队（SHSMU-ZLCX20212301）; 上海市科学技术委员会科研项目（21DZ2292000）

Protein profiling analysis of oral squamous cancer derived extracellular vesicle subgroups

WU Ruo-yi¹, WANG Xiao-ning², ZHAI Pei-song¹, ZHANG Jian-jun¹, CHEN Wan-tao¹

1. Department of Oromaxillofacial Head and Neck Oncology, 2. Department of Oral Pathology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University; National Center for Stomatology; National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology; Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology. Shanghai 200011, China

Received:2023-02-07 Revised:2023-03-27 Online:2023-07-20 Published:2023-08-16

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的：揭示通过不同免疫标志物分离获得的细胞外囊泡（extracellular vesicles,EVs）亚群在蛋白质内容物方面的共性和异质性,为后续研究选择合适的分选方案提供数据支持。方法：以口腔癌CAL27细胞为主、胰腺癌细胞PANC-1以及胃癌细胞AGS为辅作为研究对象,分别通过4种EVs分子标志物CD9、CD63、CD81和EpCAM,对不同类型细胞来源的EVs进行免疫富集沉淀,通过蛋白质谱技术对不同EVs亚群进行内容物检测,通过funrich3.1.3软件分析评价EVs亚群之间的蛋白质共性和异质性。采用SPSS 19.0软件包对数据进行统计学分析。结果：在相同培养条件下,AGS细胞产生的EVs数量最多,其次是CAL27细胞,最少的是PANC-1细胞。在4种不同的EVs标志物分选方案中,基于EpCAM标志物的分选方案效能最强。主成分分析结果显示,本研究中涉及的EVs亚群在细胞来源层面以及分选标志物层面均存在异质性。蛋白质谱细胞成分分析结果表明,在口腔癌细胞系CAL27 来源的EVs亚群中,CD63⁺ EVs富集的蛋白中有86.11%位于外泌体生成相关途径,显著高于CD9⁺、CD81⁺和EpCAM⁺ EVs亚群的占比—70.92%、70.90%和63.68%;而CD63⁺ EVs亚群中的富集蛋白有37.96%位于细胞膜,低于CD9⁺、CD81⁺和EpCAM⁺ EVs亚群的占比—53.20%、61.19%和49.53%,表明基于不同分子标志物的分选方案获得的EV亚群可能具有不同的来源。结论：本研究中涉及的EVs亚群在细胞来源层面、免疫标志物层面均存在异质性。其中CD63⁺ EVs可能更多来源于内体途径,而CD9⁺、CD81⁺和EpCAM⁺ EVs更多来源于质膜出芽途径。基于不同分选方案获得的EV亚群,在细胞生物学功能方面具有差异性。

关键词: 细胞外囊泡, 肿瘤, 异质性, 分选标志物, 外颗粒体

Abstract: PURPOSE: To reveal the commonality and heterogeneity in protein contents of extracellular vesicles (EVs) subgroups obtained by different immunomarkers, and provide data support for researchers to select appropriate isolation protocols. METHODS: In this study, oral cancer cells CAL27, pancreatic cancer cells PANC-1 and gastric cancer cells AGS were used, and EVs derived from them were isolated by 4 EVs markers CD9, CD63, CD81 and EpCAM. Then the proteins from these 4 different EVs subgroups were detected by mass spectrometry. The commonality and heterogeneity between EVs subgroups were evaluated by funrich3.1.3 software. SPSS 19.0 software package was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Under the same culture conditions, AGS cells produced the highest number of EVs, followed by CAL27 cells and the least by PANC-1 cells. Among the 4 different EVs isolation methods, the EpCAM marker-based isolation method was the most efficacious. The results of principal component analysis showed that the subgroups of EVs involved in this study were heterogeneous at the level of cell origin as well as at the level of isolation markers. The results of the cellular component analysis of the protein profile showed that 86.11% of the proteins enriched by CD63⁺ EVs derived from CAL27 were related to exosomes, which was significantly higher than the percentage of the CD9⁺, CD81⁺ and EpCAM⁺ EVs subgroups(70.92%, 70.90% and 63.68%); while 37.96% of the enriched proteins in the CD63⁺ EVs subgroup were related with cell membrane, which was lower than the percentage of CD9⁺, CD81⁺, and EpCAM⁺ EVs subgroups (53.20%, 61.19% and 49.53%), indicating that EVs subgroups isolated by different immunomarkers had different origins. CONCLUSIONS: The subgroups of EVs involved in this study are heterogeneous at the cellular origin level and at the immunomarker level. Among them, CD63⁺ EVs may originate more from the endosomal pathway, while CD9⁺, CD81⁺ and EpCAM⁺ EVs originate more from the plasma membrane outgrowth pathway. The EVs subgroups obtained based on different isolation markers were differential in terms of cell biological functions.

Key words: Extracellular vesicles, Tumor, Heterogeneity, Isolation markers, Ectosome

中图分类号:

R739.8

吴若怡, 王晓宁, 翟培淞, 张建军, 陈万涛. 上皮癌来源细胞外囊泡亚群蛋白质谱分析[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2023, 21(4): 326-331.

WU Ruo-yi, WANG Xiao-ning, ZHAI Pei-song, ZHANG Jian-jun, CHEN Wan-tao. Protein profiling analysis of oral squamous cancer derived extracellular vesicle subgroups[J]. China J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2023, 21(4): 326-331.

参考文献

[1] Wang XY, Guo JN, Yu PY, et al.The roles of extracellular vesicles in the development, microenvironment, anticancer drug resistance, and therapy of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma[J]. J Exp Clin Cancer Res, 2021, 40(1): 35-51.
[2] Moirangthem A, Gondaliya P, Yan IK, et al.Extracellular vesicle mediated mir-126-3p transfer contributes to inter-cellular communication in the liver tumor microenvironment[J]. Int J Oncol, 2023, 62(2): 31.
[3] Kriauciūnaite K, Kausyle A, Pajarskiene J, et al.Immortalised hippocampal astrocytes from 3xtg-ad mice fail to support bbb integrity in vitro: role of extracellular vesicles in glial-endothelial communication[J]. Cell Mol Neurobiol, 2021, 41(3): 551-562.
[4] Tkach M, Kowal J, Zucchetti AE, et al.Qualitative differences in t-cell activation by dendritic cell-derived extracellular vesicle subtypes[J]. EMBO J, 2017, 36(20): 3012-3028.
[5] Marar C, Starich B, Wirtz D.Extracellular vesicles in immunomodulation and tumor progression[J]. Nat Immunol, 2021, 22(5): 560-570.
[6] He GP, Peng XQ, Wei SB, et al.Exosomes in the hypoxic tme: from release, uptake and biofunctions to clinical applications[J]. Mol Cancer, 2022, 21(1): 19-40.
[7] Tian F, Zhang SH, Liu C, et al.Protein analysis of extracellular vesicles to monitor and predict therapeutic response in metastatic breast cancer[J]. Nat Commun, 2021,12(1): 2536.
[8] Shao HL, Im H, Castro CM, et al.New technologies for analysis of extracellular vesicles[J]. Chem Rev, 2018,118(4): 1917-1950.
[9] Kalluri R, LeBleu VS. The biology, function,biomedical applications of exosomes[J]. Science, 2020, 367(6478): eaau6977.
[10] Mathieu M, Nevo N, Jouve M, et al. Specificities of exosome versus small ectosome secretion revealed by live intracellular tracking of CD63 and CD9[J]. Nat Commun, 2021, 12(1): 4389.e1-4389.e18.
[11] Buzas EI.The roles of extracellular vesicles in the immune system[J]. Nat Rev Immunol, 2023, 23(4): 236-250.
[12] Théry C, Witwer KW, Aikawa E, et al.Minimal information for studies of extracellular vesicles 2018 (MISEV2018): a position statement of the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles and update of the MISEV2014 guidelines[J]. J Extracell Vesicles, 2018, 7(1): 1535750.
[13] Garcia-Martin R, Brandao BB, Thomou T, et al.Tissue differences in the exosomal/small extracellular vesicle proteome and their potential as indicators of altered tissue metabolism[J]. Cell Rep, 2022,38(3): 110277.
[14] Logozzi M, Spugnini E, Mizzoni D, et al.Extracellular acidity and increased exosome release as key phenotypes of malignant tumors[J]. Cancer Metastasis Rev, 2019, 38(1-2): 93-101.
[15] Logozzi M, Angelini DF, Iessi E, et al.Increased PSA expression on prostate cancer exosomes in in vitro condition and in cancer patients[J]. Cancer Lett, 2017, 403: 318-329.
[16] Wang T, Gilkes DM, Takano N, et al.Hypoxia-inducible factors and RAB22A mediate formation of microvesicles that stimulate breast cancer invasion and metastasis[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2014, 111(31): E3234-E3242.
[17] Guerreiro EM, Ovstebo R, Thiede B, et al.Cancer cell line-specific protein profiles in extracellular vesicles identified by proteomics[J]. PLoS One, 2020, 15(9): e0238591.
[18] Simeone P, Bologna G, Lanuti P, et al. Extracellular vesicles as signaling mediators and disease biomarkers across biological barriers[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2020, 21(7): 2514.e1-2514.e27.
[19] Xu KY, Liu L, Wu KH, et al.Altered protein profile of plasma extracellular vesicles in oral squamous cell carcinoma development[J]. J Proteomics, 2022, 251: 104422.

上皮癌来源细胞外囊泡亚群蛋白质谱分析

Protein profiling analysis of oral squamous cancer derived extracellular vesicle subgroups

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	刘雨, 陈羽菱, 林云涛, 杨宏宇. MAP7D3在头颈部鳞状细胞癌中的作用探讨[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2023, 21(4): 352-359.
[2]	陈悦, 毛艳. 基于体验的护患协同设计在头颈部肿瘤术后患者家庭肠内营养中的应用[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2023, 21(4): 366-371.
[3]	李萍, 罗涛, 黄灿, 周驰, 孙宇. 口腔颌面-头颈恶性肿瘤术后急性肾损伤的发生率及危险因素分析[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2023, 21(4): 384-389.
[4]	司呈云, 刘梦秋, 翁海燕, 章礼玉, 安星妃, 周瑜. MRI测量和评估口腔黏膜鳞状细胞癌临床分期指标的准确性分析[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2023, 21(4): 390-396.
[5]	向富萍, 侯黎莉, 杨玲, 王钰, 梁家青. 头颈部肿瘤患者术后发生谵妄危险因素的meta分析[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2023, 21(4): 407-412.
[6]	陈铭韬, 樊奇, 张陈平, 张志愿, 季彤, 任振虎. 65例头颈部恶性肿瘤根治术后急性肺血栓栓塞症临床分析[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2023, 21(3): 258-262.
[7]	韩林孜, 周建华, 赵谦, 董磊, 陈正岗, 邱建忠, 袁荣涛. 肿瘤相关成纤维细胞对头颈部鳞状细胞癌肿瘤浸润免疫细胞的调控作用及机制探讨[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2023, 21(2): 119-124.
[8]	王悦平, 徐诸凤, 施佳敏, 袁卫军, 侯黎莉. “新冠”疫情下一种新型气管切开导管防护装置在口腔肿瘤患者中的应用[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2023, 21(2): 137-141.
[9]	陈伟良. 延长垂直下斜方肌岛状肌皮瓣修复重建大型头颈部缺损[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2023, 21(1): 1-10.
[10]	龚霞, 李佳, 熊屏, 丁昂昂. 头颈部脉管肿瘤的超声诊断[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2022, 20(6): 521-526.
[11]	席庆. 舌根肿瘤,开放手术还是机器人手术?[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2022, 20(6): 527-533.
[12]	徐诸凤, 侯黎莉, 王悦平, 谢瑜婷, 刘浏, 郁玺玺. 基于德尔菲法的口腔颌面头颈肿瘤患者气管切开居家护理方案的构建[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2022, 20(4): 371-377.
[13]	曾丽婷, 吴嘉骏, 范晶娴, 王伟, 杨天页, 王繁麟, 徐兵, 葛奎. 拉出法与插入法经皮内镜下胃造瘘术在口腔颌面部恶性肿瘤患者中的应用效果比较[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2022, 20(4): 401-404.
[14]	仝春实, 马欣, 范明亮, 王永功, 彭利伟, 骆书文. 8例青少年沙瘤样骨化纤维瘤临床分析[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2022, 20(3): 287-291.
[15]	瞿俊晨, 贾传海, 丁庆国, 曹锐, 丘佳明. MRI图像纹理分析在腮腺良、恶性肿瘤鉴别诊断中的价值[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2022, 20(2): 173-176.