改良鼻旁植骨减少Le Fort I型截骨术后上颌骨垂直向复发的探讨

doi:10.19438/j.cjoms.2023.02.011

中国口腔颌面外科杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (2): 163-167.doi: 10.19438/j.cjoms.2023.02.011

改良鼻旁植骨减少Le Fort I型截骨术后上颌骨垂直向复发的探讨

葛卫文¹, 祁磊¹, 王昀², 张雷¹

1.上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院口腔颅颌面科,上海交通大学口腔医学院,国家口腔医学中心, 国家口腔疾病临床医学研究中心,上海市口腔医学重点实验室,上海市口腔医学研究所,上海 200011;
2.上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院整复外科,上海市组织工程研究重点实验室,上海 200011

收稿日期:2022-11-14 修回日期:2022-12-23 出版日期:2023-03-20 发布日期:2023-06-12
通讯作者: 张雷,E-mail: oral66@126.com
作者简介:葛卫文（1997-）,男,硕士,E-mail: nostalojalopy@163.com
基金资助:
上海市自然科学基金（20ZR1432200）; 上海九院偏突颌畸形生物样本库项目（YBKB202110）

Modified paranasal bone grafting reduced vertical maxillary recurrence after Le Fort Ⅰ osteotomy

GE Wei-wen¹, QI Lei¹, WANG Yun², ZHANG Lei¹

1. Department of Oral and Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University; National Center for Stomatology; National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology; Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology. Shanghai 200011;
2. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Tissue Engineering. Shanghai 200011, China

Received:2022-11-14 Revised:2022-12-23 Online:2023-03-20 Published:2023-06-12

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的： 探讨改良鼻旁植骨是否能减少Le Fort 1型截骨下降手术术后上颌骨垂直向的复发。方法： 选择双颌手术中上颌骨下降幅度>3 mm的患者30例,分为改良鼻旁植骨组和非改良鼻旁植骨组。利用术前(T0)、术后3天(T1)和术后6个月(T2)的颌面CT数据对上颌骨位置进行三维测量;同时利用T1与T2的CT数据计算植骨块厚度的变化。采用SPSS 22.0 软件包对数据进行统计学分析。结果： 术后6个月,在垂直方向上,改良鼻旁植骨组上切牙点复发量为（0.54±0.35）mm,非改良鼻旁植骨组上切牙点复发量为（1.18±0.76）mm（P=0.3997）。2组在前后、水平方向的复发率无显著差异。改良鼻旁植骨组的植骨块厚度降低（11.75±6.25）%,非改良鼻旁植骨组的植骨块厚度降低（33.77±11.56）%(P<0.0001)。结论： 改良鼻旁植骨可有效减少植骨块吸收,以及术后上颌骨垂直向复发。

关键词: 鼻旁植骨, 复发, 三维分析, Le Fort Ⅰ型截骨术, 正颌手术

Abstract: PURPOSE: To evaluate if the modified paranasal bone grafting can reduce the recurrence of Le Fort I osteotomy for maxillary downward. METHODS: A total of 30 patients with a large maxillary downward movement (>3 mm) during orthognathic surgery were included in the study. Patients were divided into modified paranasal bone grafting group and non-modified paranasal bone grafting group. Three-dimensional measurements of the maxillary position were taken using maxillofacial CT data at preoperative(T0), 3 days postoperatively(T1), and 6 months postoperatively (T2). Meanwhile, CT scans of T1 and T2 were used to calculate the changes in bone thickness. SPSS 22.0 software package was used for data analysis. RESULTS: At 6 months after operation, in the vertical direction, the recurrence amount of U1 in the modified paranasal bone grafting group was (0.54±0.35)mm, and the recurrence amount of U1 in the non-modified paranasal bone grafting group was (1.18±0.76)mm(P=0.3997). There was no significant difference in recurrence between the two groups in the anteroposterior and horizontal directions. In the modified group, the bone graft thickness was reduced by (11.75±6.25)%, and that of the non-modified group was (33.77±11.56)%(P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Modified nasal bone graft can effectively reduce the absorption of bone graft and decrease the vertical recurrence of maxilla.

Key words: Paranasal bone grafting, Recurrence, 3D analysis, Le Fort I osteotomy, Orthognathic surgery

中图分类号:

R782.2

葛卫文, 祁磊, 王昀, 张雷. 改良鼻旁植骨减少Le Fort I型截骨术后上颌骨垂直向复发的探讨[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2023, 21(2): 163-167.

GE Wei-wen, QI Lei, WANG Yun, ZHANG Lei. Modified paranasal bone grafting reduced vertical maxillary recurrence after Le Fort Ⅰ osteotomy[J]. China J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2023, 21(2): 163-167.

参考文献

[1] Wu RT, Wilson AT, Gary CS, et al.Complete reoperation in orthognathic surgery[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2019, 143(5): 1053e-1059e.
[2] Proffit WR, Turvey TA, Phillips C.The hierarchy of stability and predictability in orthognathic surgery with rigid fixation: an update and extension[J]. Head Face Med, 2007, 3: 21-31.
[3] Haas Junior OL, Guijarro-Martinez R, de Sousa Gil AP, et al. Hierarchy of surgical stability in orthognathic surgery: overview of systematic reviews[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2019, 48(11): 1415-1433.
[4] Lee JY, Kim YI, Kang HJ, et al.Stability of Le Fort I osteotomy with propeller graft for canting correction in facial asymmetry[J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2015, 26(7): 2077-2080.
[5] Ueki K, Okabe K, Marukawa K, et al.Maxillary stability after Le Fort I osteotomy with self-setting alpha-tricalcium phosphate and an absorbable plate[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2013, 42(5): 597-603.
[6] Lye KW, Deatherage JR, Waite PD.The use of demineralized bone matrix for grafting during Le Fort I and chin osteotomies: techniques and complications[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2008, 66(8): 1580-1585.
[7] Rohner D, Hailemariam S, Hammer B.Le Fort I osteotomies using Bio-Oss^® collagen to promote bony union: a prospective clinical split-mouth study[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2013, 42(5): 585-591.
[8] Luo M, Yang X, Wang Q, et al.Skeletal stability following bioresorbable versus titanium fixation in orthognathic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2018, 47(2): 141-151.
[9] Yang HJ, Hwang SJ.Postoperative stability following maxillary downward movement with Le Fort I inclined osteotomy at the lateral nasal cavity wall[J]. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 2012, 40(8): 793-798.
[10] Susarla SM, Ettinger R, Preston K, et al.Two-point nasomaxillary fixation of the Le Fort I osteotomy: assessment of stability at one year postoperative[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2020, 49(4): 466-470.
[11] Tabrizi R, Mirmohammad Sadeghi H, Bakhshaei P, et al.Does platelet-rich fibrin increase stability of the maxilla following Le Fort I osteotomy? a single-blind clinical trial study[J]. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 2020, 48(6): 531-535.
[12] Araujo A, Schendel SA, Wolford LM, et al.Total maxillary advancement with and without bone grafting[J]. J Oral Surg, 1978, 36(11): 849-858.
[13] Ueki K, Miyazaki M, Okabe K, et al.Assessment of bone healing after Le Fort I osteotomy with 3-dimensional computed tomography[J]. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 2011, 39(4): 237-243.
[14] Convens JM, Kiekens RM, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, et al.Stability of Le Fort I maxillary inferior repositioning surgery with rigid internal fixation: a systematic review[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2015, 44(5): 609-614.
[15] Mehra P, Castro V, Freitas RZ, et al.Stability of the Le Fort I osteotomy for maxillary advancement using rigid fixation and porous block hydroxyapatite grafting[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2002, 94(1): 18-23.
[16] Sharma AP, Stringer DE.Autogenous mandibular bone graft for maxillary Le Fort I osteotomy interpositional gap in orthognathic surgery: a technique case series[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2019, 77(5): 1068 e1-68 e36.
[17] Naros A, Bayazeed B, Schwarz U, et al.A prospective histomorphometric and cephalometric comparison of bovine bone substitute and autogenous bone grafting in Le Fort I osteotomies[J]. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 2019, 47(2): 233-238.
[18] Marx RE.Bone and bone graft healing[J]. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am, 2007, 19(4): 455-466.
[19] Stetzer K, Cooper G, Gassner R, et al.Effects of fixation type and guided tissue regeneration on maxillary osteotomy healing in rabbits[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2002, 60(4): 427-436.
[20] Jünger TH, Krenkel C, Howaldt HP.Le Fort I sliding osteotomy-a procedure for stable inferior repositioning of the maxilla[J]. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 2003, 31(2): 92-96.

改良鼻旁植骨减少Le Fort I型截骨术后上颌骨垂直向复发的探讨

Modified paranasal bone grafting reduced vertical maxillary recurrence after Le Fort Ⅰ osteotomy

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王守鹏, 孟箭, 张雷. 上颌骨Le Fort Ⅰ型截骨术后上颌窦炎的研究现状[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2023, 21(1): 75-80.
[2]	许飞虎, 徐万林, 刘胜文, 丁修明, 张祥, 杨雯君. 腮腺区复发性多形性腺瘤恶变侵犯颧骨1例报告[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2021, 19(6): 573-576.
[3]	瞿然奕, 汪席均, 江凌勇. 垂直向控制在矫正成人骨性Ⅱ类高角错畸形应用中的研究进展[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2021, 19(3): 284-288.
[4]	林钊宇, 周斌, 陈伟良, 汪延, 陈睿, 钟江龙. 斜方肌肌皮瓣联合肩胛骨肌皮瓣修复晚期头颈肿瘤术后下颌骨贯穿性缺损6例报道[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2020, 18(5): 447-450.
[5]	袁卫军, 李丽, 杨霞, 刘婷, 单瑛, 朱怡. 牙颌面畸形患者术后留置胃管对口腔健康相关生活质量的影响[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2019, 17(6): 518-521.
[6]	徐万林, 朱云, 卢浩, 刘丽敏, 沈淑坤, 刘胜文, 杨雯君. 15例下颌下腺复发性多形性腺瘤临床病理分析[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2019, 17(5): 465-468.
[7]	宋昊天, 杨驰. 45例复发性颞下颌关节前脱位的分类及治疗探讨[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2019, 17(4): 352-355.
[8]	范永晶, 金武龙, 刘莹. 200例颌骨囊性病变临床回顾分析[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2019, 17(3): 269-274.
[9]	王知俊, 吴书凤, 俞创奇, 谢李松, 石欢, 曹宁宁, 郑凌艳. 儿童复发性腮腺炎免疫功能检测和分析[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2019, 17(2): 123-128.
[10]	河奈玲, 洪越扬, 杨筱, 房兵, 江凌勇. 功能板影响错伴特发性髁突吸收正颌术后稳定性的初步研究[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2018, 16(4): 338-342.
[11]	库都斯·克依木，陈一铭，徐前，季彤. 34例下颌骨中心性癌临床、病理及预后分析[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2018, 16(3): 253-258.
[12]	张伟, 刘宁, 陈方文, 李明月, 秦中平. 改良胸大肌肌皮瓣在复发性头颈癌挽救性手术缺损重建中的应用[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2017, 15(4): 357-360.
[13]	邓刚，李晓光，何悦，于德栋. 复发性腮腺多形性腺瘤的手术治疗及并发症预防[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2017, 15(3): 227-229.
[14]	唐渔，季彤. 成纤维生长因子受体2在原发及复发成釉细胞瘤中的表达及意义[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2017, 15(3): 254-258.
[15]	陈睿，杨朝晖，陈伟良，王友元，范松，张大明. 18例侵犯颈动脉的复发性口腔、口咽鳞状细胞癌的挽救性手术治疗效果评价[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2017, 15(3): 277-281.