中文版ELPO手术体位相关性压力性损伤风险评估表在口腔颅颌面肿瘤手术中的应用评价

doi:10.19438/j.cjoms.2020.04.009

中国口腔颌面外科杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (4): 333-337.doi: 10.19438/j.cjoms.2020.04.009

中文版ELPO手术体位相关性压力性损伤风险评估表在口腔颅颌面肿瘤手术中的应用评价

应元婕, 张莉, 杨旭, 薛慧敏, 黄燕^*, 杨悦来^*

上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院手术室,上海 200011

收稿日期:2019-11-21 出版日期:2020-07-20 发布日期:2020-09-10
通讯作者: 黄燕,E-mail:huangyan606@126.com;杨悦来,E-mail:yangyuelaoi@163.com。^*共同通信作者
作者简介:应元婕（1992-）,女,本科,E-mail: yingyj_miki@163.com
基金资助:
上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院护理院级基金（JYHL20182106）

Evaluation of the clinical value of the Chinese version of ELPO surgery position-related pressure ulcer risk assessment scale in oral and craniomaxillofacial tumor surgery

YING Yuan-jie, ZHANG Li, YANG Xu, XUE Hui-min, HUANG Yan, YANG Yue-lai

Operating Room, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine. Shanghai 200011, China

Received:2019-11-21 Online:2020-07-20 Published:2020-09-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的: 对英文版ELPO手术体位相关性压力性损伤风险评估量表进行汉化及信效度检验,评价中文版ELPO在口腔颅颌面肿瘤手术中的应用效果。方法: 获得原作者同意后,将ELPO量表遵循汉化量表流程,进行翻译及回译。采取便利抽样法,选择上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院271例口腔颅颌面肿瘤择期手术患者,对研究对象进行压力性损伤风险评估。通过评估内容效度、结构效度、预测效度,验证量表效度;采用内部一致Cronbach α系数、评定者间信度,检验量表信度。应用量表对患者进行风险评估,实施相应干预措施。采用SPSS 23.0软件包对数据进行统计学分析。结果: 总量表的内容效度为0.952。探索性因子分析共提取3个公因子,累积方差贡献率为61.538%;灵敏度86%,特异度83%, 阳性预测值87%, 阴性预测值60%,ROC曲线下面积为0.836。总量表内部一致性Cronbach α系数0.751,评定者间信度为0.812。271例患者仅2例发生术中压力性损伤,发生率为0.74%。结论: 中文版ELPO量表具有良好的信、效度,用于口腔颅颌面肿瘤手术患者,可使手术室护士有计划地进行护理干预,有效降低压力性损伤的发生率,优化手术室护理服务。

Abstract: PURPOSE: To translate and verify the reliability and validity of the risk assessment scale for the development of injuries due to surgical positioning（ELPO）,and to analyze the clinical value of Chinese version of ELPO in oral and craniomaxillofacial tumor surgery. METHODS: After obtaining the consent of the original authors, the ELPO scale follows the process of the Chinese standard scale for translation and back translation. A convenient sampling method was used to select 271 patients with elective surgery for oral and craniomaxillofacial tumors at Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital,Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine. The scale was validated by evaluating content validity, structure validity and predictive validity. The internal consistency Cronbach's alpha coefficient and inter-evaluator reliability were used to test the validity of the scale. The reliability of the scale was tested, the patients were assessed for risk by applying a scale, and interventions were implemented. SPSS 23.0 software package was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The content validity of the total scale was 0.952. The exploratory factor analysis extracted 3 common factors, the cumulative variance contribution rate was 61.538%. The sensitivity was 86%, the specificity was 83%, the positive prediction rate was 87%, and the negative prediction rate was 60%. The area under the ROC curve was 0.836, the internal consistency of the total table was Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.751, and the inter-rater reliability was 0.812. Only 2 of 271 patients had intraoperative pressure ulcers, the incidence was 0.74%. CONCLUSIONS: The Chinese version of ELPO scale has good reliability and validity. It is used to implement nursing intervention for patients with oral and craniomaxillofacial tumor surgery. It enables the operating room nurses to systematically perform nursing interventions, thereby effectively reducing the incidence of stress injuries and optimizing operating room care services.

Key words: Surgical position-related, Pressure ulcers, Oral and craniomaxillofacial tumor surgery, Reliability, Validity

中图分类号:

R739.8

应元婕, 张莉, 杨旭, 薛慧敏, 黄燕, 杨悦来. 中文版ELPO手术体位相关性压力性损伤风险评估表在口腔颅颌面肿瘤手术中的应用评价[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2020, 18(4): 333-337.

YING Yuan-jie, ZHANG Li, YANG Xu, XUE Hui-min, HUANG Yan, YANG Yue-lai. Evaluation of the clinical value of the Chinese version of ELPO surgery position-related pressure ulcer risk assessment scale in oral and craniomaxillofacial tumor surgery[J]. China J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2020, 18(4): 333-337.

参考文献

[1] 郭月, 余云红, 赵体玉. 手术室患者压疮临床特点的回顾性分析[J]. 护理学杂志, 2014, 29(24): 36-39.
[2] Defloor T, Grypdonck MF.Pressure ulcers: validation of two risk assessment scales[J]. J Clin Nurs, 2005, 14(3): 373-382.
[3] 张秀平, 张兰梅, 任杰平. 术中压疮护理单在手术室压疮高危病人护理中的应用[J]. 护理研究, 2013, 27(21): 2237-2238.
[4] Klein Nulent TJW, Noorlag R, Van Cann EM, et al.Intraoral ultrasonography to measure tumor thickness of oral cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Oral Oncol, 2018, 77: 29-36.
[5] 娄锡钢. 老年口腔颌面部肿瘤患者的手术治疗效果[J]. 中国现代药物应用, 2019,13(17):46-47.
[6] 朱守林, 瞿小龙, 李来娟, 等. 压疮知识培训对压疮现患率及预防措施的效果分析[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2016, 20(16): 213-214.
[7] 贾红影, 段征征, 吴欣娟, 等. 临床护士压疮风险评估现状及影响因素研究进展[J]. 护理研究, 2016, 30(5): 1537-1540.
[8] Lopes CMM, Haas VJ, Dantas RAS, et al.Assessment scale of risk for surgical positioning injuries[J]. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem, 2016, 24: e2704.
[9] Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al.Guidelines for the process of cross -cultural adaptation of self -report measures[J]. Spine, 2000, 25(24): 3186-3191.
[10] European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel, National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel. Treatment of pressure ulcers: quick reference guide[M].Washington DC: National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel,2014:14-15.
[11] 刘可. 如何进行内容效度的检验[J]. 护士进修杂志, 2010, 25(1): 37-39 .
[12] 吴明隆. 问卷统计分析实务: SPSS操作与应用 [M]. 重庆:重庆大学出版社, 2010.
[13] 史静琤, 莫显昆, 孙振球. 量表编制中内容效度指数的应用[J]. 中南大学学报(医学版), 2012, 37(2): 152-155.
[14] 李峥, 刘宇. 护理学研究方法[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2012: 299-358.
[15] 安胜利, 陈平雁. 量表的信度及其影响因素[J]. 中国社会医学杂志, 2002, 19(1): 23-27.
[16] 陈杰, 杨晓红, 路潜, 等. 中文版重症监护疼痛观察工具在非气管插管患者中应用的信效度研究[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2015, 50(9):1132-1136.
[17] 靳苗苗. 术中急性压力性损伤影响因素的分析及其常用风险评估量表信效度的比较[D]. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2018.
[18] Kim JM, Lee HJ, Ha T, et al.Perioperative factors associated with pressure ulcer development after major surgery[J]. Korean J Anesthesiol, 2018, 71(1): 48-56.
[19] Cohen RR, Lagoo-Deenadayalan SA, Heflin MT, et al.Exploring Predictors of Complication in older surgical patients: a deficit accumulation index and the braden scale[J]. Am Geriatr Soc, 2012, 60(9): 1609-1615.
[20] Thorn CC, Smith M, Aziz O, et al.The Waterlow score for risk assessment in surgical patients[J]. Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 2013, 95(1): 52-56.
[21] Sutherland-Fraser S, McInnes E, Maher E, et al. Peri-operative nurses'knowledge and reported practice of pressure injury risk assessment and prevention: A before-after intervention study[J]. BMC Nurs, 2012, 11: 25-35.

中文版ELPO手术体位相关性压力性损伤风险评估表在口腔颅颌面肿瘤手术中的应用评价

Evaluation of the clinical value of the Chinese version of ELPO surgery position-related pressure ulcer risk assessment scale in oral and craniomaxillofacial tumor surgery

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 1

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价