自体牙移植术前难度预判因素的筛选及分析

doi:10.19438/j.cjoms.2020.02.008

中国口腔颌面外科杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (2): 132-135.doi: 10.19438/j.cjoms.2020.02.008

自体牙移植术前难度预判因素的筛选及分析

惠小勇^1,2, 侯锐^1,*, 许广杰³, 李志文¹, 杨霞¹, 周宏志^1,*, 张昊⁴, 尚磊⁴

1.军事口腔医学国家重点实验室,口腔疾病国家临床医学研究中心,陕西省口腔疾病临床医学研究中心, 空军军医大学口腔医院口腔外科,陕西西安 710032;
2.中国人民解放军火箭军广州疗养中心,广东广州 512000;
3.中国人民解放军东部战区海军医院,浙江舟山 316000;
4.空军军医大学军事预防医学系卫生统计学教研室,陕西西安 710032

收稿日期:2019-05-27 修回日期:2019-07-31 出版日期:2020-03-20 发布日期:2020-04-30
通讯作者: 侯锐,E-mail：hourui@fmmu.edu.cn;周宏志,E-mail：zhouhongzhi@fmmu.edu.cn。^*共同通信作者
作者简介:惠小勇（1986-）,男,硕士研究生,主治医师,E-mail：274785138@qq.com

Screening and analysis of preoperative difficulty predictors for autotransplanation of tooth

HUI Xiao-yong^1,2, HOU Rui¹, XU Guang-jie³, LI Zhi-wen¹, YANG Xia¹, ZHOU Hong-zhi¹, ZHANG Hao⁴, SHANG Lei⁴

1.State Key Laboratory of Military Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shaanxi Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Department of Oral Surgery, School of Stomatology, Air Force Military Medical University. Xi'an 710032, Shaanxi Province;
2.Guangzhou Sanatorium of PLA Rocket Force. Guangzhou 512000, Guangdong Province;
3.Eastern Theater Command Naval Hospital. Zhoushan 316000, Zhejiang Province;
4.Department of Health Statistics of Military Preventive Medicine, Air Force Military Medical University. Xi'an 710032, Shaanxi Province, China

Received:2019-05-27 Revised:2019-07-31 Online:2020-03-20 Published:2020-04-30

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的:设计自体牙移植术前难度预判量表,并进行统计学验证。方法:基于文献支持和临床经验总结,对自体牙移植术前难度预判的可能因素进行统计学分析,筛选出相关性较高的11条因素并编制量表,通过96病例进行实际难度判定。采用SPSS 23.0软件包对量表进行信度和效度检验。结果:对96例病例进行难度预判的结果进行统计学分析,量表检测的克隆巴赫系数（信度值）为0.853,皮尔逊相关系数（内容效度值）为0.745,KMO值（结构效度值）为0.704,以上检验均有统计学意义。结论:所设计自体牙移植术前难度预判量表合理可行,适用于初学者进行术前难度预判分析。

关键词: 自体牙移植术, 难度预判, 信度, 效度

Abstract: PURPOSE： The purpose of this study was to design a difficulty prediction scale before autotransplanation of tooth (ATT) which was verified by statistical analysis. METHODS: Based on the literature and clinical experience, all of the possible factors for difficulty prediction before ATT were summarized. Eleven factors with high correlation were screened out and tabulated. The actual difficulty was verified by clinical cases. Statistical analysis was performed to check the reliability and validity of the scale with SPSS 23.0 software package. RESULTS: Data were expressed as follows, Cronbach's alpha (reliability value) was 0.853, Pearson's correlation coefficient (PCCs, content validity value) was 0.745, and Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO, structural validity value) was 0.704. CONCLUSIONS: The preoperative difficulty prediction scale designed for ATT is reasonable and feasible. It is suitable for residents to make analysis of preoperative difficulty prediction.

Key words: Autotransplanation of tooth, Difficulty prediction, Reliability, Validity

中图分类号:

R782.1

惠小勇, 侯锐, 许广杰, 李志文, 杨霞, 周宏志, 张昊, 尚磊. 自体牙移植术前难度预判因素的筛选及分析[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2020, 18(2): 132-135.

HUI Xiao-yong, HOU Rui, XU Guang-jie, LI Zhi-wen, YANG Xia, ZHOU Hong-zhi, ZHANG Hao, SHANG Lei. Screening and analysis of preoperative difficulty predictors for autotransplanation of tooth[J]. China J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2020, 18(2): 132-135.

参考文献

[1] Hale ML.Autogenous transplants[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, 1956, 9(1): 76-83.
[2] Tsukiboshi M.Autotransplantation of Teeth[M]. Chicago: Quintessence Pub. Co., 2001.
[3] 侯锐. 自体牙移植术:自体牙移植术简介[J]. 中国实用口腔科杂志, 2013, 6(8): 449-452.
[4] Yang S, Jung B, Pang N.Outcomes of autotransplanted teeth and prognostic factors: a 10-year retrospective study[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2019, 23(1): 87-98.
[5] Strbac GD, Giannis K, Mittlböck M, et al.Survival rate of autotransplanted teeth after 5 years-A retrospective cohort study[J]. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 2017, 45(8): 1143-1149.
[6] Rohof ECM, Kerdijk W, Jansma J, et al.Autotransplantation of teeth with incomplete root formation: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2018, 22(4): 1613-1624.
[7] Machado LA, Do Nascimento RR, Ferreira DM, et al.Long-term prognosis of tooth autotransplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2016, 45(5): 610-617.
[8] 郝元涛, 孙希凤, 方积乾, 等. 量表条目筛选的统计学方法研究[J]. 中国卫生统计杂志, 2004, 21(4): 209-211.
[9] Devellisa RF, 著. 量表编制理论与应用[M]. 魏勇刚, 龙长权, 宋武, 译. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 2010.
[10] 郑锐. 也谈统计工作的“工匠精神”[J]. 中国统计, 2019, 67(2): 76-77.
[11] Mertens B, Boukari A, Tenenbaum H.Long-term follow up of post-surgical tooth autotransplantation: a retrospective study[J]. J Investig Clin Dent, 2016, 7(2): 207-214.
[12] 侯锐, 许广杰, 惠小勇, 等. 自体牙移植300例临床分析[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2018, 16(1): 25-28.
[13] Kim S, Shin SJ, Park JW, et al.Long-term stability of autotransplanted premolars as a substitute for molars in adults[J]. J Endod, 2016,42(8):1286-1290.
[14] Kafourou V, Tong HJ, Day P, et al.Outcomes and prognostic factors that influence the success of tooth autotransplantation in children and adolescents[J]. Dent Traumatol, 2017, 33(5): 393-399.
[15] Plakwicz P, Wojtowicz A, Czochrowska EM.Survival and success rates of autotransplanted premolars: A prospective study of the protocol for developing teeth[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2013, 144(2): 229-237.
[16] Kim S, Lee SJ, Shin Y, et al.Vertical bone growth after autotransplantation of mature third molars: 2 case reports with long-term follow-up[J]. J Endod, 2015, 41(8): 1371-1374.
[17] Pohl Y, Filippi A, Kirschner H.Extraoral endodontic treatment by retrograde insertion of posts: A long-term study on replanted and transplanted teeth[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2003, 95(3): 355-363.
[18] 米施著美. 现代口腔种植学 [M]. 第3版. 北京: 人民军医出版社, 2015.
[19] 周宏志, 胡开进, 秦瑞峰, 等. 下颌阻生第三磨牙拔除难度预判[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2009, 25(3): 327-329.

自体牙移植术前难度预判因素的筛选及分析

Screening and analysis of preoperative difficulty predictors for autotransplanation of tooth

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 2

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	中华口腔医学会牙及牙槽外科专业委员会. 自体牙移植术规范化操作流程中国专家共识[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2020, 18(5): 390-394.
[2]	应元婕, 张莉, 杨旭, 薛慧敏, 黄燕, 杨悦来. 中文版ELPO手术体位相关性压力性损伤风险评估表在口腔颅颌面肿瘤手术中的应用评价[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2020, 18(4): 333-337.