China Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery ›› 2015, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (6): 502-507.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Applied anatomic study and clinical application of anterolateral thigh perforator flap

XU Lei, GAO Peng-fei, XU Wan-Lin, CHENG Jie, LI Huai-qi, WU Yu-nong, YE Jin-hai.   

  1. Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases;Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Stomatology, Nanjing Medical University. Nanjing 210029, Jiangsu Province, China
  • Received:2015-08-12 Online:2015-11-20 Published:2015-12-03
  • Contact: 国家自然科学基金(81371123);江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目(2014-37)

Abstract: PURPOSE : To provide anatomic evidence for clinical application of anterolateral thigh flap, this study compared the appearance and function of donor site and recipient site pre- and post-operatively in order to investigate the clinical value in reconstruction of oral and maxillofacial defects. METHODS : Six lower limbs of Chinese adult cadavers were microsurgically dissected and the number of perforators was recorded based on anterolateral thigh perforator flap, the external diameters, pedicle lengths, and locations were measured. Nine clinical cases of anterolateral thigh perforator flap were selected from May 2011 to May 2014, the flap size ranged from 5 cm×6 cm to 6 cm×12 cm. The patients were evaluated during postoperative follow-up including flap survival number, contour and function of recipient and donor site, and their swallowing and speech function after reconstruction of the tongue and/or floor of mouth. RESULTS : Totally 21 anterolateral thigh perforaters(each leg on average 3.5) were found in 6 legs. Nearly all perforaters of the anterolateral thigh were located in a 6 cm diameter circle, the center of the circle was located 1 cm horizontally and 2 cm vertically to the middle line between the anterior superior iliac spine and the patellar lateral edge. The external diameter of vessel pedicle was (2.99±0.48) mm and the pedicle length was (15.83±3.52)cm. Among the 9 anterolateral thigh perforator flaps, 1 flap had partial necrosis, 1 case was lost for follow up. All the cases were followed up for 10-47 months (mean 24 months). Anterolateral thigh flap was favourable in survival rate, donor or recipient site complications, swallowing and speech function. CONCLUSIONS : Anterolateral thigh flap has constant perforator, longer pedicle and suitable diameter. Clinically, anterolateral thigh flap has fewer complications, moderate size and pleasing contour, which satisfy the need for reconstruction of oral and maxillofacial defects.

Key words: Perforator flap, Applied anatomy, Anterolateral thigh perforator flap

CLC Number: