China Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery ›› 2021, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (4): 350-353.doi: 10.19438/j.cjoms.2021.04.012

• Original Articles • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparative study of four trauma scoring systems to evaluate maxillofacial fractures

CHEN Chen1, SUN Ning-ning2, HE Yang3, AN Jin-gang3, GONG Xi3, ZHANG Yi3   

  1. 1. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2. Department of Emergency Critical Care, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University. Qingdao 266000, Shandong Province;
    3. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology. Beijing 100081, China
  • Received:2020-08-06 Revised:2020-09-16 Online:2021-07-20 Published:2021-08-05

Abstract: PURPOSE: To select a scoring system suitable for scoring of maxillofacial trauma by comparing the effects of four commonly used trauma scoring systems. METHODS: This study cohort comprised 1 009 patients with maxillofacial trauma from January 2008 to December 2013 at Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology. There were 46 cases with simple maxillary fractures, 536 cases with simple mandibular fractures, 233 cases with simple zygomatic arch fractures, and 194 cases with compound fractures. New Injury Severity score (NISS), Facial Injury Severity Score (FISS), Maxillofacial Injury Severity Score (MFISS), and Maxillofacial Injury Severity Score (MISS) were used to grade the injury severity of the patients before surgery. The data were imported into SPSS 21.0 software package. Correlation coefficients between the results of the four scoring systems and clinical effective indexes were calculated by non-parametric correlation analysis. Multivariate linear regression analysis was carried out with length of stay and hospitalization expenses as dependent variables. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the score of mandibular fracture and zygomatic fracture by NISS. When FISS, MFISS, and MISS were applied, there was no significant difference between maxillary fracture scores and mandibular fracture scores(P>0.05). NISS, FISS, MFISS and MISS were positively correlated with operation time, cost of anesthesia, length of hospitalization stay, and correlation coefficients of MFISS were the highest(0.475,0.485, 0.434). The difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). Trauma score and concomitant injury were positively significant influencing factors of length of hospital stay and hospitalization expenses(P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: MFISS showed the highest correlation with clinical effective indexes, and affected the length of hospital stay and hospitalization expenses significantly. MFISS reflected the injury severity of maxillofacial trauma better.

Key words: Maxillofacial trauma, Facial fracture, Trauma scoring, Injury severity score

CLC Number: