鼻音计鼻音化率值与腭咽闭合状态关系的探讨

doi:10.19438/j.cjoms.2023.04.009

中国口腔颌面外科杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (4): 372-376.doi: 10.19438/j.cjoms.2023.04.009

鼻音计鼻音化率值与腭咽闭合状态关系的探讨

高涛¹, 马莲², 罗奕², 孙勇刚²

1.北京积水潭医院口腔科,北京 100035;
2.北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院口腔颌面外科,国家口腔疾病临床医学研究中心,口腔数字化医疗技术和材料国家工程实验室,口腔数字医学北京市重点实验室,北京 100081

收稿日期:2023-02-24 修回日期:2023-04-20 出版日期:2023-07-20 发布日期:2023-08-16
通讯作者: 马莲,E-mail: lamaiana@public.bta.net.cn
作者简介:高涛（1977-）,男,博士,E-mail: hawwk@sina.com

The relationship between nasalance and velopharyngeal closure status after cleft palate surgery

GAO Tao¹, MA Lian², LUO Yi², SUN Yong-gang²

1. Department of Stomatology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital. Beijing 100035;
2. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology; National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases; National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology; Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology. Beijing 100081, China

Received:2023-02-24 Revised:2023-04-20 Online:2023-07-20 Published:2023-08-16

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的：探讨腭裂术后继发结构性语音障碍患者鼻音化率值与腭咽闭合状态的相关关系。方法：选择北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院口腔颌面外科腭裂修复术后继发结构性语音障碍患者407个语音样本数据,应用鼻音计鼻音化率值及鼻咽纤维内镜腭咽闭合状态VAS值进行腭咽闭合功能评价。采用SPSS 13.0软件包对数据进行统计学分析。结果：407个语音样本数据鼻音化率值与VAS值呈现负相关倾向,腭咽闭合功能越差,鼻音化率值越高,296个数据具有显著相关性。其中,连续音节[dadada]最敏感,各语音样本相关系数排序如下：R_[dadada]>R_{[ta qu wu xi shi]}>R_[sasasa]>R_[sisisi]>R_[dididi]>R_[papapa]>R_[i]> R_[pipipi]>R_[u]>R_{[wo dao hei long jiang]}>R_[a]。具有显著相关的296个数据依腭咽闭合状态分类统计,完全或边缘腭咽闭合鼻音化率值小于30%,轻度腭咽闭合不全鼻音化率值在30%~50%之间,中重度腭咽闭合不全鼻音化率值大于50%。结论：鼻音计应用特定语音样本,可初步提示腭裂术后继发结构性语音障碍的腭咽闭合状态,非鼻辅音的音节及语句具有较高的敏感性,单元音/a/和/u/敏感性较差。

关键词: 腭裂, 腭咽闭合不全, 鼻音化率, 鼻咽纤维内镜

Abstract: PURPOSE: To investigate the relationship between nasalization rate and palatopharyngeal closure in patients with secondary structural speech disorder after cleft palate surgery. METHODS: A total of 407 speech samples of patients with postoperative cleft palate speech disorders without speech substitution from the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Stomatology, Peking University were included. The nasal sound meter and nasopharyngeal fiber endoscope were used to record the nasal phonation rate and the score of nasopharyngeal fiber endoscopic visual analog scale (VAS) of the speech samples. The nasal phonation rate values and VAS values were compared by Pearson analysis. SPSS 13.0 software package was used for data analysis. RESULTS: There was negative correlation between nasal phonetic rate and VAS value of 407 speech samples. Velopharyngeal insufficiency was worse, and nasal phonetic rate was higher. There was a significant negative correlation between nasal phonetic rate and VAS value of 296 non-nasal speech samples. According to VAS values of 296 non-nasal speech samples, it suggested if nasalance scores was below 30%, complete or marginal velopharyngeal closure was considered. If nasalance scores is between 30% and 50%, mild velopharyngeal impairment should be considered. If nasalance scores was over 50%, medium or severe velopharyngeal impairment should be considered. CONCLUSIONS: The study showed nasometer can give a clue preliminarily of the velopharyngeal closure status in patients with hypernasality and nasal air emission objectively.

Key words: Cleft palate, Velopharyngeal insufficiency, Nasalance, Nasopharyngeal fiber endoscopy

中图分类号:

R782.2

高涛, 马莲, 罗奕, 孙勇刚. 鼻音计鼻音化率值与腭咽闭合状态关系的探讨[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2023, 21(4): 372-376.

GAO Tao, MA Lian, LUO Yi, SUN Yong-gang. The relationship between nasalance and velopharyngeal closure status after cleft palate surgery[J]. China J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2023, 21(4): 372-376.

参考文献

[1] Sousa AD, Devare S, Ghanshani J.Psychological issues in cleft lip and cleft palate[J]. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg, 2009, 14(2): 55-58.
[2] Meier JD, Muntz HR.Velopharyngeal dysfunction evaluation and treatment[J]. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am, 2016, 24(4): 477-485.
[3] Park YH, Jo HJ, Hong IS, et al.Treatment of velopharyngeal insufficiency in a patient with a submucous cleft palate using a speech aid: the more treatment options, the better the treatment results[J]. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg, 2019, 41(1): 19-24.
[4] Shin YJ, Kim Y, Kim HG.The comparative study of resonance disorders for Vietnamese and Korean cleft palate speakers using nasometer[J]. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg, 2017, 39(1): 9-13.
[5] Rabah SM, Alkahtani FS, Jarman A, et al.Effectiveness of the superiorly based pharyngeal flap in treating velopharyngeal insufficiency[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open, 2022, 10(12): e4696.
[6] Carvajal álvarez DC, Palomares-Aguilera MM, Meneses Geldres MB, et al.Primary palatal surgery in nonsyndromic cleft palate children and velopharyngeal insufficiency correction outcomes[J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2021, 32(2): 698-704.
[7] 高涛, 马莲, 罗奕, 等. 视觉模拟评分法评价腭裂术后无声状态下腭咽闭合状态的研究[J].中华口腔医学杂志, 2012, 47(7): 419-422.
Gao T, Ma L, Luo Y, et al.Assessment of velopharyngeal status of postoperative cleft palate patients in silent mode by visual analog scale[J]. Chinese Journal of Stomatology, 2012, 47(7): 419-422.
[8] 任延方, 王光和. 腭裂术后腭咽闭合不全的诊断[J]. 中华口腔医学杂志, 1992, 27(1): 9-11.
Ren YF, Wang GH.Diagnosis of velopharyngeal insufficency after surgery of cleft palate[J]. Chinese Journal of Stomatology, 1992, 27(1): 9-11.
[9] Naran S, Ford M, Losee JE.What's new in cleft palate and velopharyngeal dysfunction management?[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2017, 139(6): 1343e-1355e.
[10] Denegri MA, Silva PP, Pegoraro-Krook MI, et al.Cephalometric predictors of hypernasality and nasal air emission[J]. J Appl Oral Sci, 2021, 29: e20210320.
[11] Kollara L, Perry JL.Effects of gravity on the velopharyngeal structures in children using upright magnetic resonance imaging[J]. Cleft Palate Craniofac J, 2014, 51(6): 669-676.
[12] Perry JL, Kuehn DP, Sutton BP, et al.Craniometric and velopharyngeal assessment of infants with and without cleft palate[J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2011, 22(2): 499-503.
[13] Perry JL, Kuehn DP, Sutton BP, et al.Anthropometric analysis of the velopharynx and related craniometric dimensions in three adult populations using MRI[J]. Cleft Palate Craniofac J, 2016, 53(1): e1-e13.
[14] Medeiros-Santana MN, Perry JL, Yaedú RY, et al.Predictors of velopharyngeal dysfunction in individuals with cleft palate following surgical maxillary advancement: clinical and tomographic assessments[J]. Cleft Palate Craniofac J, 2019, 56(10): 1314-1321.
[15] 谭洁, 何凌, 唐铭, 等. 腭裂术后腭咽闭合不全患者声门塞音自动识别[J]. 计算机工程与设计, 2016, 37(8): 2264-2270.
TAN Jie, HE Ling, TANG Ming, et al.Automatic detection of glottal stop from cleft palate patients with incomplete velopharyngeal after cleft palate surgery[J]. Computer Engineering and Design, 2016, 37(8): 2264-2270.
[16] Bakhshaee M, Jahanian M, Khazaeni K, et al.Potential effects of rhinoplasty on voice in professional voice users[J]. Aesthetic Plast Surg, 2021, 45(5): 2280-2286.
[17] Hsieh LC, Lee GS, Lee KS, et al.Hypernasality after the endoscopic modified Lothrop procedure for refractory frontal sinusitis[J]. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol, 2021, 11(8): 1260-1263.
[18] Odeh OM, Madison CL, Riski JE.Nasalance in arabic-speaking jordanians: a comparative study[J]. Folia Phoniatr Logop, 2020, 72(5): 370-377.
[19] Nguyen VT, Lehes L, Truong TTH, et al.Normative nasalance scores for vietnamese-speaking children[J]. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol, 2019, 44(2): 51-57.
[20] Sampaio-Teixeira ACM, Oliveira DN, Yamashita RP, et al.Normative nasalance scores in the production of words and syllables for Brazilian Portuguese speakers[J]. Clin Linguist Phon, 2019, 33(12): 1139-1148.
[21] Alfwaress F, Kummer AW, Weinrich B.Nasalance scores for normal speakers of American English obtained by the nasometer II using the MacKay-Kummer SNAP-R test[J]. Cleft Palate Craniofac J, 2022, 59(6): 765-773.
[22] 高涛, 马莲, 罗奕, 等. 鼻音计在不同时间普通话成人语音评价中稳定性的研究[J]. 北京口腔医学, 2013, 21(1): 40-43.
Gao T, Ma L, Luo Y, et al.Nasometer stability for evaluating the Mandarin adult speech at different time intervals[J]. Beijing Jouurnal of Stomatol, 2013, 21(1): 40-43.
[23] 高涛, 马莲, 罗奕, 等. 声门塞音对鼻音计评价腭咽闭合状态的影响[J].中华口腔医学杂志, 2020, 55(12): 958-962.
Gao T, Ma L, Luo Y, et al.Influence of glottal stops on nasalance and velopharyngeal closure status after cleft palate surgery[J]. Chinese Journal of Stomatology, 2020, 55(12): 958-962.
[24] Garcia AF, Marino VC, Pegoraro-Krook MI, et al.Nasalance during use of pharyngeal and glottal place of production[J]. Codas, 2014, 26(5): 395-401.

鼻音计鼻音化率值与腭咽闭合状态关系的探讨

The relationship between nasalance and velopharyngeal closure status after cleft palate surgery

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	蓝春慧, 张雪燕, 韦敏玲, 丁文炜, 梁建华. 整体性护理路径在先天性腭裂患儿手术护理中的应用[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2023, 21(3): 237-242.
[2]	褚珺, 胡明, 王国民, 吕挺正. 19例合并凝血功能异常的腭裂患儿围术期处理[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2022, 20(3): 282-286.
[3]	张凌, 仇琳, 纪均. 喷他佐辛预防儿童腭裂手术全麻苏醒期躁动的效果评价[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2021, 19(1): 40-44.
[4]	林晓锐, 李晨曦, 张秀华. 瑞芬太尼复合氯胺酮在婴幼儿唇腭裂手术中的麻醉效果分析[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2021, 19(1): 45-48.
[5]	赵欣然, 蔡鸣. 不同咽成形术式对腭裂术后继发腭咽闭合功能不全合并睡眠呼吸障碍的影响[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2021, 19(1): 76-81.
[6]	牟思璇, 朱妍菲, 杜常欣, 王雪纯, 吴艳棋, 梅鹏, 王旭东, 朱敏. 改良牙支持式上颌骨前部牵引成骨术与上颌骨Le Fort I型前徙术对唇腭裂患者腭咽部结构的影响[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2020, 18(5): 427-433.
[7]	张晓敏, 杨雅娴, 宗源, 林鸣. Noordhoff手术联合PNAM正畸治疗唇腭裂患儿的疗效评价[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2020, 18(4): 352-356.
[8]	彭兆伟, 钟天航, 韩剑丽, 邝亦元, 马莲. 头颅定位侧位片与鼻咽纤维镜评价腭咽闭合不全的效果评价[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2020, 18(3): 245-249.
[9]	张文静, 王霞. 非综合征唇裂伴或不伴腭裂对口腔健康相关生活质量的影响[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2020, 18(3): 255-259.
[10]	姚志涛, 安玮, 买买提吐逊·吐尔地. 50例唇腭裂患儿手术前、后血液生化指标及腭裂隙内骨再生评价[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2020, 18(1): 56-59.
[11]	阿力木江·苏甫尔, 比力克孜·玉素甫, 热娜古孜·阿不都米吉提. 新疆喀什地区非综合征型唇腭裂发病危险因素的病例对照研究[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2019, 17(5): 436-439.
[12]	石光, 张肖, 孙莹. PNAM正畸联合Noordhoff手术治疗唇腭裂患儿的效果及对腭部裂隙情况、感染发生率的影响[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2019, 17(4): 319-322.
[13]	张晓宇, 陈铮晰, 师佳君, 李竹君, 汤霞, 翁梦佳, 黄偲璟, 郑梦婷, 陈振琦. 400例唇腭裂患儿母乳喂养现况调查及影响因素分析[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2019, 17(4): 332-336.
[14]	吴忆来, 王国民, 杨育生, 万腾, 陈阳, 梁赟. 咽后壁组织瓣转移术后渗血的原因分析和处理[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2019, 17(2): 171-174.
[15]	马利, 石冰, 张东升, 郑谦. 细胞凋亡及上皮-间充质转化在腭胚突融合过程中的作用探讨[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2018, 16(6): 493-497.