腮腺浅叶部分切除术与传统腮腺浅叶切除术治疗腮腺浅叶良性肿瘤效果的meta分析

中国口腔颌面外科杂志 ›› 2016, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (3): 263-269.

腮腺浅叶部分切除术与传统腮腺浅叶切除术治疗腮腺浅叶良性肿瘤效果的meta分析

李晨曦, 刘慧, 龚忠诚, 凌彬, 克热木·阿巴斯, 林兆全

新疆医科大学第一附属医院颌面肿瘤外科,新疆乌鲁木齐 830054

收稿日期:2015-12-04 出版日期:2016-06-20 发布日期:2016-07-04
通讯作者: 林兆全,E-mail：lzqxhj@163.com
作者简介:李晨曦（1989-）,男,硕士研究生,E-mail：lichenximed@163.com

Efficacy of partial superficial parotidectomy versus superficial parotidectomy for benign neoplasm of superficial parotid gland: meta-analysis

LI Chen-xi, LIU Hui, GONG Zhong-cheng, LING Bin, KEREMU·Abasi, LIN Zhao-quan

Department of Maxillofacial Surgical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University. Urumqi 830054, Xinjiang Autonomous Region, China)

Received:2015-12-04 Online:2016-06-20 Published:2016-07-04

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的系统评价腮腺浅叶部分切除术（partial superficial parotidectomy,PSP）与解剖面神经的传统腮腺浅叶切除术（superficial parotidectomy,SP）治疗腮腺浅叶良性肿瘤的疗效及手术并发症,为治疗腮腺浅叶良性肿瘤提供参考。方法计算机检索PubMed、EMbase、The Cochrane Library（2015年第4期）、Web of Knowledge、CNKI、CBM、WanFangData和VIP,并辅以检索二次文献;收集关于PSP与SP 2种方法治疗腮腺浅叶良性肿瘤的文献,检索时限从1995年4月至2015年4月。严格执行病例选择及排除标准,独立选择文献,然后评价文献研究方法质量,按照Cochrane手册5.1.0进行文献质量评价,采用RevMan5.2软件进行meta分析。结果11篇文献符合纳入标准,共计809例患者。回归分析手术后并发症情况：①暂时性或永久性面瘫的发生率PSP较SP低[RR=0.41,95%CI（0.23,0.72）,P=0.002];②涎瘘或积液的发生率PSP较SP低[RR=0.32,95%CI（0.16,0.64）,P=0.001];③Frey综合征的发生率PSP较SP低[RR=0.38,95%CI（0.26,0.55）,P<0.0001];④面部塌陷或瘢痕畸形的发生率PSP较SP低[RR=0.19,95%CI（0.12,0.31）,P<0.0001];⑤肿瘤复发率： PSP与SP两组差异无统计学意义[RR=0.98,95%CI（0.34,2.86）,P=0.98];⑥耳大神经损伤的发生率PSP较SP低,[RR=0.39,95%CI（0.27,0.58）,P<0.0001];⑦唾液分泌量降低或口干症状的发生率PSP较SP者低,[RR=0.04,95%CI（0.02,0.09）,P<0.0001]。结论与传统SP术式治疗腮腺浅叶良性肿瘤相比,PSP手术时间短,手术并发症少,且不增加肿瘤复发风险。因此,PSP治疗腮腺浅叶良性肿瘤具有一定临床优势,值得推广应用。

关键词: 腮腺良性肿瘤, 浅叶部分切除术, 浅叶切除术, 系统评价, Meta分析, 随机对照试验

Abstract: PURPOSE: To systematically review the clinical effects and safety of partial superficial parotidectomy (PSP) and superficial parotidectomy (SP) for benign neoplasm of superficial parotid gland. METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library (Issue 4, 2015), Web of Knowledge、CNKI、CBM、Wan Fang Data and VIP up to April 2015. Randomized controlled trials involving treatment outcomes of benign neoplasm of superficial parotid gland using partial superficial parotidectomy (PSP) compared with superficial parotidectomy (SP) were included.Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality of the included studies. RevMan5.2 software was used for meta analysis. RESULTS: A total of 11 studies involving 809 patients were included. The results of meta analysis showed there were significant differences between PSP group and SP group in transient or permanent facial paresis [RR=0.41, 95%CI(0.23,0.72), P=0.002], salivary fistula or subcutaneous effusion [RR=0.32, 95%CI(0.16,0.64), P=0.001], Frey's syndrome [RR=0.38, 95%CI(0.26,0.55), P<0.0001], facial asymmetry or scar deformity [RR=0.19, 95%CI(0.12,0.31), P<0.0001], reduction of salivary flow or xerostomia [RR=0.04, 95%CI(0.02,0.09), P<0.0001]; occurrence of great auricular analgesia was significantly less in PSP group than SP group; there was no significant difference in tumor recurrence between the two groups [RR=0.98, 95%CI(0.34,2.86), P=0.98]. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with SP, PSP does not increase the recurrence rates. Meanwhile, compared with SP, PSP shows lower incidence of postoperative complications in transient or permanent facial paresis, salivary fistula or subcutaneous effusion, Frey’s syndrome, facial asymmetry or scar deformity, reduction of salivary flow or xerostomia, and great auricular analgesia.PSP is a safe and effective technique for treatment of benign neoplasm of superficial parotid gland with certain advantages over SP, which can be widely applied in clinic.

Key words: Parotid gland benign tumor, Partial superficial parotidectomy, Superficial parotidectomy, Systematic review, Meta analysis, Randomized controlled trial

中图分类号:

R781.7

李晨曦, 刘慧, 龚忠诚, 凌彬, 克热木·阿巴斯, 林兆全. 腮腺浅叶部分切除术与传统腮腺浅叶切除术治疗腮腺浅叶良性肿瘤效果的meta分析[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2016, 14(3): 263-269.

LI Chen-xi, LIU Hui, GONG Zhong-cheng, LING Bin, KEREMU·Abasi, LIN Zhao-quan. Efficacy of partial superficial parotidectomy versus superficial parotidectomy for benign neoplasm of superficial parotid gland: meta-analysis[J]. China J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2016, 14(3): 263-269.

参考文献

[1] 马大权, 俞光岩, 郭传瑸. 腮腺肿瘤的外科治疗[J]. 中国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科, 2005, 12(11): 688-689.
[2] Papadogeorgakis N. Partial superficial parotidectomy as the method of choice for treating pleomorphic adenomas of the parotid gland[J]. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2011, 49(6): 447-450.
[3] Rea JL. Partial parotidectomies: morbidity and benign tumor recurrence rates in a series of 94 cases [J]. Laryngoscope, 2000, 110(6): 924-927.
[4] Wennmo C, Spandow O, Emgard P, et al. Pleomorphic adenomas of the parotid gland: superficial parotidectomy or limited excision? [J]. J Laryngol Otol, 1988, 102(7): 603-605.
[5] O'Brien CJ. Current management of benign parotid tumors the role of limited superficial parotidectomy [J]. Head Neck, 2003, 25(11): 946-952.
[6] Helmus C. Subtotal parotidectomy: a 10-year review (1985 to 1994) [J]. Laryngoscope, 1997, 107(8): 1024-1027.
[7] Myssiorek D. Removal of the inferior half of the superficial lobe is sufficient to treat pleomorphic adenoma in the tail of the parotid gland [J]. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 1999, 125(10): 1164-1165.
[8] 俞光岩, 马大权. 腮腺肿瘤切除术的改进和发展 [J]. 中华口腔医学杂志, 2007, 42(1): 6-9.
[9] Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 [DB/OL]. 2011-03[2015-10-15]. http://www.cochrane-handbook.org.
[10] 郭敏, 席亚明, 晁荣, 等. 达沙替尼不同治疗方案治疗慢性髓细胞白血病疗效的Meta分析 [J]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2012, 12(7): 785-790.
[11] Roh JL, Kim HS, Park CI. Randomized clinical trial comparing partial parotidectomy versus superficial or total parotidectomy [J]. Br J Surg, 2007, 94(9): 1081-1087.
[12] 许晓亮. 区域性切除术治疗腮腺浅叶良性肿瘤的回顾性研究[D]. 大连: 大连医科大学, 2011.
[13] 史剑杰, 陈仕泽. 保留腮腺导管的腮腺浅叶部分切除术 [J]. 广东医学, 2000, 21(4):313-314.
[14] 黄端阳, 尹婵, 刘新福. 腮腺部分切除术治疗腮腺多形性腺瘤的临床疗效分析 [J]. 医学临床研究, 2009, 26(5): 829-831.
[15] 廖宗生. 腮腺良性肿瘤3种切除手术临床比较 [J]. 口腔医学, 2009, 29(7): 391-392.
[16] Huang X, Zheng Y, Liu X, et al. A comparison between endoscope-assisted partial parotidectomy and conventional partial parotidectomy [J]. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2009, 140(1): 70-75.
[17] 俞辉明, 房进. 腮腺区域性切除术治疗腮腺良性肿瘤疗效分析 [J]. 山东医药, 2011, 51(7): 98-99.
[18] 徐超军. 手术治疗腮腺良性肿瘤68例临床分析 [J]. 中外医疗, 2011, 30(19): 65.
[19] 吕卫民, 张慧. 两种手术方式治疗腮腺浅叶多形性腺瘤疗效观察 [J]. 中国实用医刊, 2011, 38(5): 95-96.
[20] 王忠. 改良型腮腺切除术与传统手术治疗腮腺肿瘤的临床比较 [J]. 中外医疗, 2012, 31(6): 109.
[21] 涂晓宁. 不同手术方式治疗腮腺多形性腺瘤的临床分析 [J]. 中国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科, 2007, 14(6): 345-347.
[22] Concato J, Shah N, Horwitz RI. Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs [J]. N Engl J Med, 2000, 342(25): 1887-1892.
[23] 陈泽鑫, 刘慧, 潘益峰, 等. 试验性和观察性研究相关医学文献质量评价方法 [J]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2011, 11(11): 1229-1236.
[24] Witt RL. What is the best operative practice for small benign parotid pleomorphic adenoma? [J]. Del Med J, 2011, 83(6): 175-176.
[25] Smith SL, Komisar A. Limited parotidectomy: the role of extracapsular dissection in parotid gland neoplasms [J]. Laryngoscope, 2007, 117(7): 1163-1167.