中国口腔颌面外科杂志 ›› 2014, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (4): 360-364.

• 临床总结 • 上一篇    下一篇

家族性巨大型牙骨质瘤家系临床分析

王宏伟1, 于淼1, 秦兴军1*, *, 王丽珍2, 徐立群1, 张陈平1*, *   

  1. 1.上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院·口腔医学院 口腔颌面-头颈肿瘤科#br# 2.口腔病理科,上海市口腔医学重点实验室,上海 200011
  • 收稿日期:2014-01-24 出版日期:2014-07-10 发布日期:2014-08-20
  • 通讯作者: 秦兴军,E-mail: qinxj1989@sina.com;
  • 作者简介:王宏伟(1988-),女,在读硕士研究生,E-mail:xnngo-go@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院口腔颌面-头颈肿瘤科2014“苗圃”科研基金

Familial gigantiform cementoma: analysis of a large Chinese pedigree

WANG Hong-wei1, YU Miao1, QIN Xing-jun1, WANG Li-zhen2, XU Li-qun1, ZHANG Chen-ping1   

  • Received:2014-01-24 Online:2014-07-10 Published:2014-08-20

摘要: 目的 分析总结家族性巨大型牙骨质瘤家系的临床特征。方法:对2013年发现的一个家族性巨大型牙骨质瘤家系的临床特点进行总结,采集家族中患者病史、临床表现、影像学和组织病理学资料,绘制家系谱,并结合相关文献,总结该家系的临床特点和遗传方式。结果:该家系4代共33人,患者13例,其中男8例,女5例。所有患病者均在11~13岁开始发病,14~16岁进入迅速增长期,18~20岁病变发展趋于停滞。发病时间集中在青春发育期,自限性明显。13例患病者中,8例有下肢长骨骨折病史,均集中出现在13~16岁,大多骨折3~4次,原因多为受到轻微外力。结论:该家族性巨大型牙骨质瘤家系符合常染色体显性遗传特征,根据其临床特征我们把病程分为3个时期:① 发病初期;② 迅速增长期;③ 生长停滞期。

关键词: 家族性巨大型牙骨质瘤, 家系, 常染色体显性遗传, 长骨骨折

Abstract: PURPOSE: Familial gigantiform cementoma (FGC) is a rare autosomal dominant benign odontogenic tumor. The purpose of this study is to describe the clinical characteristics of FGC in a Chinese family with multiple-affected members. METHODS: Detail screening was conducted on family members of a 13-year-old Chinese male with recent diagnosis of FGC. All family members of the patient were interviewed. Demographic, past medical and surgical histories were collected from family members with history of FGC diagnosis. Clinical information related to the lesions (symptom, age of onset, history of treatment, histological and radiological findings) was obtained. Literature review was also presented in this study. RESULTS: In this study, we found a four-generation Han Chinese family with thirteen affected members with diagnosis of FGC. Eight male patients and five female patients were appreciated in the study. All 13 patients experienced the onset of symptoms at 11-13 years old followed by a rapid and expansive growth phrase at the age of 14-16, and growth suppression phase around age 18 to 20 years old. Eight patients in our series had sustained multiple pathological long bone fractures (average 3-4 x/person) between the age of 13 and 16 years. CONCLUSIONS: The familial history of this case helps to demonstrate that the inheritance pattern of FGC was autosomal dominant. FGC usually presented with three distinctive growth phrases: ①Initial onset; ②Rapid expansion; ③Growth suppression phase.

Key words: Familial gigantiform cementoma, Pedigree, Autosomal dominant inheritance, Long bone fracture

中图分类号: