内镜辅助下经口入路与口外入路切除咽旁间隙巨大良性肿瘤的效果比较

doi:10.19438/j.cjoms.2020.01.005

中国口腔颌面外科杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (1): 28-32.doi: 10.19438/j.cjoms.2020.01.005

内镜辅助下经口入路与口外入路切除咽旁间隙巨大良性肿瘤的效果比较

林诗耿¹, 徐雄均², 陈洋¹, 李劲松^3*, 范松^3*

1.海南省人民医院·海南医学院附属海南医院口腔颌面外科,海南海口 570311;
2.中山大学附属第三医院口腔科,广东广州 510620;
3.中山大学附属孙逸仙纪念医院口腔颌面外科,广东广州 510120

收稿日期:2019-02-21 出版日期:2020-01-20 发布日期:2020-03-09
通讯作者: 李劲松,E-mail:lijs2015@yeah.net;范松,E-mail:fansong8888@163.com。^*共同通信作者
作者简介:林诗耿(1983-),男,硕士,E-mail:117551484@qq.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(81460105)

Endoscopy-assisted transoral approach versus external approaches in resection of large benign parapharyngeal space tumors

LIN Shi-geng¹, XU Xiong-jun², CHEN Yang¹, LI Jin-song³, FAN Song³

1.Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hainan General Hospital, Affiliated Hainan Hospital of Hainan Medical University. Haikou 570311, Hainan Province;
2.Department of Stomatology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yet-sen University. Guangzhou 510620, Guangdong Province;
3.Department of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Affiliated to Sun Yat-sen University. Guangzhou 510120, Guangdong Province

Received:2019-02-21 Online:2020-01-20 Published:2020-03-09

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的: 比较内镜辅助下经口入路(endoscopy-assisted transoral approach,EATA)与口外入路(external approaches, EAs)2种手术方式在巨大良性咽旁间隙肿瘤(parapharyngeal space tumors, PSTs)切除术中的临床效果。方法: 将62例PST患者分为EATA组和EA组,比较2组患者围术期及术后的临床数据,采用SPSS 21.0软件包对数据进行统计学分析。结果: 所有肿瘤均完整切除。EATA组中6例患者术中转为口外入路。EA组中8例患者术中采用内镜进行辅助手术。EATA组的术中出血量、引流总量、术后疼痛评分、总住院天数均显著少于EA组(P<0.05),术后面容外形满意度评分显著高于EA组(P<0.05)。结论: 采用EATA手术方式切除咽旁间隙良性巨大肿瘤,可以减少手术创伤,获得更好的术后面容外形。然而,2种术式联合应用,可获得更好的手术效果。

关键词: 内镜, 咽旁间隙, 肿瘤

Abstract: PURPOSE: This study compared the clinical effects of endoscopy-assisted transoral approach (EATA) and external approaches (EAs) in the treatment of massive benign parapharyngeal space tumor. METHODS: Sixty-two patients with parapharyngeal space tumors(PSTs) were divided into EATA group and EA group. The perioperative and postoperative clinical data was statistically analysed using SPSS 21.0 software package. RESULTS: All tumors were completely removed. Six patients in EATA group switched to an extraoral approach during surgery. Eight patients in EA group underwent endoscopic surgery. The intraoperative blood loss, total drainage, postoperative pain score, and total length of hospital stay in EATA group were significantly less than those in EA group(P<0.05). The postoperative facial appearance satisfaction score was significantly higher in EATA group than that in EA group (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Use of EATA to remove benign large tumors in the parapharyngeal space can reduce surgical trauma and obtain a better postoperative facial appearance. However, a combination of the two procedures can achieve better surgical results.

Key words: Endoscopy, Parapharyngeal space, Neoplasms

中图分类号:

R739.8

林诗耿, 徐雄均, 陈洋, 李劲松, 范松. 内镜辅助下经口入路与口外入路切除咽旁间隙巨大良性肿瘤的效果比较[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2020, 18(1): 28-32.

LIN Shi-geng, XU Xiong-jun, CHEN Yang, LI Jin-song, FAN Song. Endoscopy-assisted transoral approach versus external approaches in resection of large benign parapharyngeal space tumors[J]. China J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2020, 18(1): 28-32.

参考文献

[1] Rzepakowska A, Osuch-Wójcikiewicz E, Krupa Z, et al.Surgical treatment results of parapharyngeal space tumors: a report of 22 cases[J]. Otolaryngol Pol, 2018, 72(4): 9-16.
[2] Hussain A, Ah-See KW, Shakeel M.Trans-oral resection of large parapharyngeal space tumours[J]. Eur Arch Otorh inolaryngol, 2014, 271(3): 575-582.
[3] Cassoni A, Terenzi V, Della Monaca M, et al.Parapharyngeal space benign tumours: our experience[J]. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 2014, 42(2): 101-105.
[4] Chen WL, Wang WJ, Huang ZQ, et al.Osteotomy in the vertical ramus outside the mandibular foramen for tumours in the parapharyngeal space[J]. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 2014, 42(3): e29-e32.
[5] Chen WL, Wang YY, Zhang DM, et al.Endoscopy-assisted transoral resection of large benign parapharyngeal space tumors[J]. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2014, 52(10): 970-973.
[6] 张大明, 陈伟良, 林钊宇, 等. 下颌下入路联合下颌支冠状劈开切除咽旁肿瘤的探讨[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2014, 12(3): 243-246.
[7] Fan S, Liang FY, Chen WL, et al.Minimally invasive selective neck dissection: a prospective study of endoscopically assisted dissection via a small submandibular approach in cT_1-2N₀ oral squamous cell carcinoma[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2014, 21(12): 3876-3881.
[8] Fan S, Chen WL, Yang ZH, et al.Comparison of the efficiencies of permanent maxillary tooth removal performed with single buccal infiltration versus routine buccal and palatal injection[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2009, 107(3): 359-363.
[9] Ljichi K, Murakami S.Surgical treatment of parapharyngeal space tumors: A report of 29 cases[J]. Oncol Lett, 2017, 14(3): 3249-3254.
[10] 张强, 李龙江, 包崇云, 等. 颞下咽旁间隙原发性肿瘤临床及病理分析[J]. 实用口腔医学杂志, 2013, 29(6): 883-885.
[11] 张先锋, 曹放云, 彭正加. 内镜辅助口内入路摘除咽旁间隙肿瘤体会[J]. 中南医学科学杂志, 2016, 44(3): 350-360.
[12] Goodwin WJ Jr, Chandler JR.Transoral excision of lateral parapharyngeal space tumors presenting intraorally[J]. Laryngoscope, 1988, 98(3): 266-269.
[13] Mendelsohn AH.Transoral robotic assisted resection of the parapharyngeal space[J]. Head Neck, 2015, 37(2): 273-280.
[14] Lee HS, Kim J, Lee HJ, et al.Transoral robotic surgery for neurogenic tumors of the prestyloid parapharyngeal space[J]. Auris Nasus Larynx, 2012, 39(4): 434-437.
[15] Van Rompaey J, Suruliraj A, Carrau R, et al.Access to the parapharyngeal space: an anatomical study comparing the endoscopic and open approaches[J]. Laryngoscope, 2013, 123(10): 2378-2382.

内镜辅助下经口入路与口外入路切除咽旁间隙巨大良性肿瘤的效果比较

Endoscopy-assisted transoral approach versus external approaches in resection of large benign parapharyngeal space tumors

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	韩林孜, 周建华, 赵谦, 董磊, 陈正岗, 邱建忠, 袁荣涛. 肿瘤相关成纤维细胞对头颈部鳞状细胞癌肿瘤浸润免疫细胞的调控作用及机制探讨[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2023, 21(2): 119-124.
[2]	王悦平, 徐诸凤, 施佳敏, 袁卫军, 侯黎莉. “新冠”疫情下一种新型气管切开导管防护装置在口腔肿瘤患者中的应用[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2023, 21(2): 137-141.
[3]	陈伟良. 延长垂直下斜方肌岛状肌皮瓣修复重建大型头颈部缺损[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2023, 21(1): 1-10.
[4]	龚霞, 李佳, 熊屏, 丁昂昂. 头颈部脉管肿瘤的超声诊断[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2022, 20(6): 521-526.
[5]	席庆. 舌根肿瘤,开放手术还是机器人手术?[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2022, 20(6): 527-533.
[6]	徐诸凤, 侯黎莉, 王悦平, 谢瑜婷, 刘浏, 郁玺玺. 基于德尔菲法的口腔颌面头颈肿瘤患者气管切开居家护理方案的构建[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2022, 20(4): 371-377.
[7]	曾丽婷, 吴嘉骏, 范晶娴, 王伟, 杨天页, 王繁麟, 徐兵, 葛奎. 拉出法与插入法经皮内镜下胃造瘘术在口腔颌面部恶性肿瘤患者中的应用效果比较[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2022, 20(4): 401-404.
[8]	仝春实, 马欣, 范明亮, 王永功, 彭利伟, 骆书文. 8例青少年沙瘤样骨化纤维瘤临床分析[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2022, 20(3): 287-291.
[9]	瞿俊晨, 贾传海, 丁庆国, 曹锐, 丘佳明. MRI图像纹理分析在腮腺良、恶性肿瘤鉴别诊断中的价值[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2022, 20(2): 173-176.
[10]	陈泽源, 刘怡彬, 再米热·依布拉音, 张思敏, 买买提吐逊·吐尔地. 腮腺超声造影对43例腮腺肿瘤的诊断价值评价[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2022, 20(2): 177-183.
[11]	罗彬, 周美云, 田绣云, 陈鑫如, 韩瑞, 徐锦程. 数字化及3D打印联合内镜辅助技术治疗12例颧骨颧弓骨折效果评价[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2022, 20(2): 188-192.
[12]	瞿楚翔, 孙树洋, 张志愿. 从遗传异质性认识口腔鳞癌的侵袭过程[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2022, 20(2): 193-197.
[13]	李燕, 黄瑶, 倪莹, 杨悦来, 殷琦. 头颈肿瘤患者重症监护期间睡眠促进方案的构建与评价[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2022, 20(1): 68-71.
[14]	杨云博, 王钰璞, 李行, 韩楠男, 严明, 阮敏. 半胱氨酸酶抑制剂A在口腔鳞癌中的表达及临床意义[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2021, 19(6): 494-499.
[15]	樊文慧, 石慧烽, 涂文勇. 2种不同形变配准软件在头颈部勾画中的作用评价[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2021, 19(6): 517-524.