微螺钉型种植体支抗对成人双颌前突患者的疗效分析

doi:10.19438/j.cjoms.2017.06.008

中国口腔颌面外科杂志 ›› 2017, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (6): 519-523.doi: 10.19438/j.cjoms.2017.06.008

微螺钉型种植体支抗对成人双颌前突患者的疗效分析

郭忠军^1,2, 周洪¹, 李瑞春², 韩凤琴²

1.西安交通大学口腔医院正畸科,陕西西安 710004
2.陕西省渭南市中心医院口腔科,陕西渭南 714000

收稿日期:2016-10-10 修回日期:2017-04-25 出版日期:2017-11-20 发布日期:2017-12-21
通讯作者: 周洪,E-mail:zhouhong@mail.xjtu.edu.com
作者简介:郭忠军（1983-）,男,在读硕士研究生,主治医师,E-mail:guozhongjun777@126.com
基金资助:
渭南市科技创新扶持项目(2013KYS-2)

Clinical effect of micro screw implant anchorage in the treatment of adult patients with double jaw protrusion

GUO Zhong-jun^1,2, ZHOU Hong¹, LI Rui-chun², HAN Feng-qin²

1.Department of Oral Surgery, Stomatology Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University. Xi'an 710004;
2.Department of Stomatology, Central Hospital of Weinan City. Weinan 714000,Shaanxi Province, China

Received:2016-10-10 Revised:2017-04-25 Online:2017-11-20 Published:2017-12-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨成人双颌前突畸形患者采用微螺钉型种植体支抗治疗的临床疗效。方法双颌前突畸形患者100例,随机数字表法分为2组,对照组50例,采用传统口外加强支抗方案进行治疗;实验组50例,采用微螺钉型种植体支抗进行治疗。比较2组患者治疗后的唇部软组织,上、下颌牙槽突,牙列及上、下颌骨变化状况。采用SPSS19.0软件包对数据进行t检验。结果实验组患者的治疗时间为（18.84±2.61）个月,显著短于对照组的（24.72±2.32）个月;治疗后实验组患者的上唇、下唇突度差值,上唇、下唇-E线差值,唇间隙差值均显著高于对照组（P<0.05）;治疗后实验组患者的上切牙、下切牙突度差值,上、下中切牙角差值,上、下牙槽突度差值均显著高于对照组（P<0.05）。结论成人双颌前突畸形患者采用微螺钉型种植体支抗治疗疗效显著,值得临床推广应用。

关键词: 成人, 双颌前突, 微螺钉型种植体支抗

Abstract: PURPOSE: To investigate the clinical effect of micro screw implant anchorage in the treatment of adult patients with double jaw protrusion. METHODS: A total of 100 adult patients with bimaxillary protrusion were stratified into micro screw implant anchorage group (n=50) and extraoral anchorage group (n=50) according to different treatment methods. The differences of lip protrusion, upper alveolar protrusion and lower alveolar protrusion, dentition,mandible and maxilla were evaluated after treatment. SPSS 19.0 software package was performed for data analysis. RESULTS: The treatment duration of micro screw implant anchorage group and extraoral anchorage group was (18.84±2.61) month and (24.72±2.32) months, respectively, which was significantly different (P<0.05). The difference of upper lip protrusion, lower lip protrusion, upper lip-E line, lower lip-E line and lip gap before and after treatment were significant between 2 groups. The differences of the upper incisors protrusion, lower incisors protrusion, the upper central incisors angle, the lower central incisors angle, upper alveolar protrusion and lower alveolar protrusion before and after treatment in micro screw implant anchorage group were significantly greater than those in extraoral anchorage group (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The clinical effect of micro screw implant anchorage in the treatment of adult patients with double jaw protrusion deformity is significant, which is worthy of clinical application.

Key words: Adult, Double jaw protrusion, Micro screw implant anchorage

中图分类号:

R782.2

郭忠军, 周洪, 李瑞春, 韩凤琴. 微螺钉型种植体支抗对成人双颌前突患者的疗效分析[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2017, 15(6): 519-523.

GUO Zhong-jun, ZHOU Hong, LI Rui-chun, HAN Feng-qin. Clinical effect of micro screw implant anchorage in the treatment of adult patients with double jaw protrusion[J]. China J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2017, 15(6): 519-523.

参考文献

[1] 岳士超, 杜跃华, 唐晓君, 等. 微螺钉种植体支抗与口外支抗对正畸前后上颌或双颌前突变化的Meta分析 [J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2012, 16(21): 3881-3885.
[2] 张慧君, 吕长胜. 双颌前突诊断与正颌外科治疗进展 [J]. 中国美容整形外科杂志, 2016, 27(2): 103-106.
[3] 武冠英, 杨琳, 徐宝华, 等. 双颌前突患者正畸辅助微螺钉种植体治疗前后的软组织侧貌[J]. 中华医学美学美容杂志, 2013, 19(5): 343-346.
[4] 杨一帆, 杨磊, 丁寅, 等. 种植体支抗矫正双颌前突畸形疗效回顾性研究 [J].中国实用口腔科杂志, 2014, 7(8): 475-478.
[5] 倪密, 陈文静. 微种植体支抗治疗双颌前突患者前后颜面形态改变的研究 [J]. 口腔医学, 2014, 34(4): 241-244.
[6] Miyawaki S, Koyama I, Inoue M, et al. Factors associated with the stability of titanium screws placed in the posterior region for orthodontic anchorage [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2013, 124(4): 373-378.
[7] 冯毅. 微型种植体支抗在青少年口腔正畸治疗中的应用 [J]. 河北医药, 2013, 35(3): 352-353.
[8] 赵红卫, 杨雨民. 微螺钉种植体支抗在成人双颌前突正畸治疗中的临床应用[J]. 内蒙古民族大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 25(2): 215-216.
[9] 郭军, 法永红, 蔡兴伟, 等. 微型种植体支抗近移磨牙过程中的强支抗效应[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2010, 14(9): 1577-1580.
[10] 肖永芳, 徐宝华, 刘静明, 等. 微型种植体支抗治疗成人骨性Ⅱ类错▉畸形患者的研究 [J]. 中国美容医学杂志, 2012, 21(7): 1207-1209.
[11] 钟广军. 微种植体支抗在矫治成人骨性双颌前突中的效果观察 [J]. 当代医学, 2013, 19(24): 97-98.
[12] 华泽权, 李欣欣, 张力, 等. 正颌联合正畸治疗骨性双颌前突畸形的临床疗效观察 [J]. 临床口腔医学杂志, 2011, 27(8): 485-486.
[13] 段银钟, 曾照斌. 正畸、正颌联合矫治严重颅颌面畸形骨性双颌前突正畸、正颌治疗[J]. 中国实用口腔科杂志, 2011, 4(7): 385-389.
[14] Scott SH, Johnston LE Jr. The perceived impact of extraction and nonextraction treatments on matched samples of African American patients [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1999, 116 (3): 352-360.
[15] Hayashida H, Ioi H, Nakata S, et al. Effects of retraction of anterior teeth and initial soft tissue variables on lip changes in Japanese adults [J]. Eur J Orthod, 2011, 33(4): 419-426.
[16] Farrow AL, Zarrinnia K, Azizi K. Bimaxillary protrusion in black Americans-an esthetic evaluation and the treatment considerations [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2013, 104(3): 240-250.
[17] Lew K. Profile changes following orthodontic treatment of bimaxillary protrusion in adults with the Begg appliance[J]. Eur J Orthod, 2012, 11(4): 375-381.
[18] Geron S, Shpack N, Kandos S, et al. Anchorage loss a multifactorial response [J]. Angle Orthod, 2013, 73(6) : 730-737.
[19] Thiruvenkatachari B, Pavithranand A, Rajasigamani K, et al. Comparison and measurement of the amount of anchorage loss of the molars with and without the use of implant anchorage during canine retraction [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2014, 129(4): 551-554.

微螺钉型种植体支抗对成人双颌前突患者的疗效分析

Clinical effect of micro screw implant anchorage in the treatment of adult patients with double jaw protrusion

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 4

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王博, 于洪波, 夏韫晖, 房兵, 郭秋曼. 牙槽骨再生正畸技术治疗成人错畸形伴原发性牙槽骨缺损的远期疗效评价[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2022, 20(3): 225-229.
[2]	高志彪, 王磊, 肖霞, 高朵朵. 3种不同手术入路治疗成人髁突骨折效果分析[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2022, 20(2): 184-187.
[3]	张馨匀, 李婵, 李洪发. 成人颞下颌关节骨关节病骨性改变与Helkimo指数的关系[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2018, 16(1): 64-68.
[4]	王博, 于洪波, 孙良龑, 沈国芳, 王旭东, 房兵, 郭秋曼. 槽骨再生正畸治疗成人中重度牙周炎错畸形远期疗效评价[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2016, 14(3): 234-238.