兔上唇唇裂术后创口愈合过程中增生性瘢痕的变化趋势

doi:10.19438/j.cjoms.2017.06.003

中国口腔颌面外科杂志 ›› 2017, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (6): 493-497.doi: 10.19438/j.cjoms.2017.06.003

兔上唇唇裂术后创口愈合过程中增生性瘢痕的变化趋势

刘峰^*, 张岱尊^*, 肖文林, 薛令法, 许尧祥

青岛大学附属医院口腔医学中心,山东省教育厅口腔医学重点实验室,山东青岛 266003

收稿日期:2017-01-23 修回日期:2017-04-21 出版日期:2017-11-20 发布日期:2017-12-21
通讯作者: 肖文林,E-mail：wenlinxiao@sina.com
作者简介:刘峰（1991-）,女,硕士研究生,E-mail：13070869707@163.com;张岱尊（1975-）,女,硕士,E-mail：zhangdaizun@sina.com。*并列第一作者
基金资助:
山东省自然科学基金（ZR2015HM022）

Research on wound healing and variation of hypertrophic scar in rabbit after cleft lip surgery

LIU Feng, ZHANG Dai-zun, XIAO Wen-lin, XUE Ling-fa, XU Yao-xiang

Department of Stomatology, the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University; Key Laboratory of Oral Clinical Medicine of Shandong Province. Qingdao 266003, Shandong Province, China

Received:2017-01-23 Revised:2017-04-21 Online:2017-11-20 Published:2017-12-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的观察兔唇裂术后瘢痕增生的变化趋势,探讨唇裂术后瘢痕最大增生程度发生时间,为后续研究基因治疗增生性瘢痕最有效时机的选择提供依据。方法选用同一子代近交系纯种新西兰白兔40只,采用Millard唇裂修复术,制造出创伤愈合的瘢痕模型,分别在术后第2、3、4、5周进行肉眼观察和瘢痕体积测量,切取上唇瘢痕组织进行免疫组织化学石蜡切片染色（IHC-P）、肌成纤维细胞（MFB）计数,提取瘢痕组织中α平滑肌肌动蛋白（α-SMA）进行蛋白质免疫印迹实验。所得数据采用SPSS 18.0软件包进行t检验。结果肉眼观察,兔上唇唇裂术后创口愈合在不同时期有不同变化,术后第3、4周,瘢痕收缩较为明显,其中瘢痕体积、MFB细胞计数及α-SMA的表达与术后第2、5周相比,有显著差异（P<0.01）。结论唇裂术后瘢痕增生严重程度大致呈正态分布,α-SMA作为MFB的分化标志物,为在蛋白水平测定瘢痕严重程度提供了客观依据。

关键词: 兔, 唇裂, 增生性瘢痕, 肌成纤维细胞, α平滑肌肌动蛋白

Abstract: PURPOSE: To observe the hyperplasia trend of hypertrophic scar after cleft lip surgery in rabbits, and to explore the exact time of the largest degree of hypertrophic scar after cleft lip repair, which provided a theoretical basis for the study of the most effective time of gene therapy for hypertrophic scars. METHODS: Forty New Zealand white rabbits from the same offspring were used to make wound healing model in cleft lip Millard's procedure. The volumes were measured respectively and granulation tissues were observed visually at 2nd week, 3rd week, 4th week and 5th week after operation. The rabbits were sacrificed and scar tissues were harvested in the indicated time. Immunohistochemical paraffin section (IHC-P), myofibroblast (MFB) cell count and Western blot were performed to detect the expression level of α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) in the scar tissue. SPSS 18.0 software package was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The results showed that the scar contraction was significant at 3rd and 4th week, comparing to 2nd and 5th week after surgery. The degree of scar hyperplasia after surgery was approximately in normal distribution. CONCLUSIONS: MFBs were important cells in scar formation and α-SMA was an important marker of MFBs. The study provides an objective basis for determination of scar severity by measuring the protein expression of α-SMA.

Key words: Rabbit, Cleft lip, Hypertrophic scar, Myofibroblast, α-smooth muscle actin

中图分类号:

R782.2

刘峰, 张岱尊, 肖文林, 薛令法, 许尧祥. 兔上唇唇裂术后创口愈合过程中增生性瘢痕的变化趋势[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2017, 15(6): 493-497.

LIU Feng, ZHANG Dai-zun, XIAO Wen-lin, XUE Ling-fa, XU Yao-xiang. Research on wound healing and variation of hypertrophic scar in rabbit after cleft lip surgery[J]. China J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2017, 15(6): 493-497.

参考文献

[1] Mossey PA, Little J, Munger RG, et al. Cleft lip and palate [J]. Lancet, 2009, 374(9703): 1773-1785.
[2] Marazita ML, Field LL, Cooper ME, et al. Genome scan for loci involved in cleft lip with or without cleft palate, in Chinese multiplex families [J]. Am J Hum Genet, 2002, 71(2): 349-364.
[3] Kaban LB, Dodson TB, Longaker MT, et al. Fetal cleft lip repair in rabbits: long-term clinical and cephalometric results [J]. Cleft Palate Craniofac J, 1993, 30(1): 13-21.
[4] 刘志敏, 翦新春, 姚志刚, 等. 兔唇创口愈合中肌成纤维细胞变化的实验研究 [J]. 口腔医学研究, 2003, 19(6): 473-475.
[5] Powers PS, Sarkar S, Goldgof DB, et al. Scar assessment: current problems and future solutions [J]. J Burn Care Rehabil, 1999, 20(1 Pt 1): 54-60.
[6] Millar K, Bell A, Bowman A, et al. Psychological status as a function of residual scarring and facial asymmetry after surgical repair of cleft lip and palate [J]. Cleft Palate Craniofac J, 2013, 50(2): 150-157.
[7] Christofides E, Potgieter A, Chait L. A long term subjective and objective assessment of the scar in unilateral cleft lip repairs using the Millard technique without revisional surgery [J]. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg, 2006, 59(4): 380-386.
[8] Wilson AD, Mercer N. Dermabond tissue adhesive versus Steri-Strips in unilateral cleft lip repair: an audit of infection and hypertrophic scar rates [J]. Cleft Palate Craniofac J, 2008, 45(6): 614-619.
[9] Nocini PF, D'Agostino A, Trevisiol L, et al. Treatment of scars with Er:YAG laser in patients with cleft lip: a preliminary report [J]. Cleft Palate Craniofac J, 2003, 40(5): 518-522.
[10] Johnson A, DiPietro LA. Apoptosis and angiogenesis: an evolving mechanism for fibrosis [J]. FASEB J, 2013, 27(10): 3893-3901.
[11] Kim S, Choi TH, Liu W, et al. Update on scar management: guidelines for treating Asian patients[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2013, 132(6): 1580-1589.
[12] Soltani AM, Francis CS, Motamed A, et al. Hypertrophic scarring in cleft lip repair: a comparison of incidence among ethnic groups [J]. Clin Epidemiol, 2012, 4(2): 187-191.
[13] Gurtner GC, Dauskardt RH, Wong VW, et al. Improving cutaneous scar formation by controlling the mechanical environment: large animal and phase I studies [J]. Ann Surg, 2011, 254(2): 217-225.
[14] Monstrey S, Middelkoop E, Vranckx JJ, et al. Updated scar management practical guidelines: non-invasive and invasive measures [J]. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg, 2014, 67(8): 1017-1025.
[15] 刘飞, 吴凤卿, 梁智. 增生性瘢痕动物模型的研究进展 [J].医学综述, 2009, 15(1): 18-21.
[16] Varkey M, Ding J, Tredget EE. Differential collagen-glycosaminoglycan matrix remodeling by superficial and deep dermal fibroblasts: potential therapeutic targets for hypertrophic scar [J]. Biomaterials, 2011, 32(30): 7581-7591.
[17] Gurtner GC, Werner S, Barrandon Y, et al. Wound repair and regeneration [J]. Nature, 2008, 453(7193): 314-321.
[18] Kisseleva T, Brenner DA. Mechanisms of fibrogenesis [J]. Exp Biol (Maywood), 2008, 233(2): 109-122.
[19] Badid C, Mounier N, Costa AM, et al. Role of myofibroblasts during normal tissue repair and excessive scarring: interest of their assessment in nephropathies [J]. Histol Histopathol, 2000, 15(1): 269-280.
[20] Kolosova I, Nethery D, Kern JA. Role of Smad2/3 and p38 MAP kinase in TGF-β1-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition of pulmonary epithelial cells [J]. J Cell Physiol, 2011, 226(5): 1248-1254.
[21] Shi HX, Lin C, Lin BB, et al. The anti-scar effects of basic fibroblast growth factor on the wound repair in vitro and in vivo[J]. PLoS One, 2013, 8(4): e59966.
[22] Du QC, Zhang DZ, Chen XJ, et al. The effect of p38MAPK on cyclic stretch in human facial hypertrophic scar fibroblast differentiation [J]. PLoS One, 2013, 8(10): e75635.

兔上唇唇裂术后创口愈合过程中增生性瘢痕的变化趋势

Research on wound healing and variation of hypertrophic scar in rabbit after cleft lip surgery

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 13

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	迟浩姝, 詹宗历, 赵志扬, 蔡鸣. 改良鬼冢法治疗单侧唇裂术后短期唇峰高度的对称性分析[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2022, 20(6): 560-564.
[2]	李辉, 黄林剑, 谢千阳, 杨驰. 体外培养的兔下颌骨髁突对机械压力的反应和变化[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2022, 20(4): 340-346.
[3]	张文静, 王霞. 非综合征唇裂伴或不伴腭裂对口腔健康相关生活质量的影响[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2020, 18(3): 255-259.
[4]	李一颖, 杨学财, 候志军, 胡宁宁, 王俊伟, 初晓艺, 辛俊彤. 口腔黏膜瓣用于非综合征型单侧完全性唇裂鼻底修复的效果评价[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2018, 16(5): 425-430.
[5]	单俊，曾文霞，刘世恩,徐豪越，朱海涛，宋凯，冯元勇,吴大雄,尚伟. C/Gd纳米复合物用于兔舌间质磁共振淋巴造影的应用价值评价[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2018, 16(3): 205-208.
[6]	周宇宁, 马吴迪, 桂志鹏, 夏伦果, 徐袁瑾. 糖尿病兔骨髓间充质干细胞成骨分化能力探讨[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2017, 15(2): 103-108.
[7]	刘小郁, 白希婧, 杨学文. 兔上颌窦外侧壁截骨对上颌窦黏膜功能的影响[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2016, 14(6): 500-504.
[8]	黄林剑, 蔡协艺, 李辉, 盛夏涵, 杨驰. 兔下颌骨髁突软骨年龄相关性改变的组织学研究[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2015, 13(3): 200-204.
[9]	田海锁, 蔺栋鹏, 赵天一, 于擘, 马秦. 点阵Er:YAG激光照射兔口腔黏膜后的组织学变化[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2015, 13(2): 117-123.
[10]	梁赟, 杨育生, 吴忆来, 张勇, 王国民. 口轮匝肌肌瓣瓦合法在单侧唇裂一期修复中的应用[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2015, 13(1): 28-30.
[11]	唐晓朋, 袁奎封, 来庆国, 杨中军, 慈江波. 引导组织再生膜促进兔下颌骨牵张成骨的实验研究[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2014, 12(6): 492-497.
[12]	代天国, 何悦. 肌成纤维细胞与颌骨放射性骨坏死[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2014, 12(4): 368-372.
[13]	黄林剑, 张秀丽, 李妙然, 李辉, 邓亚伟, 蔡协艺. 生长期兔髁突软骨细胞体外培养方法及其生物学特性研究[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2014, 12(1): 7-12.