中国口腔颌面外科杂志

中国口腔颌面外科杂志 ›› 2017, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (5): 457-462.doi: 10.19438/j.cjoms.2017.05.016

• 循证医学 • 上一篇    下一篇

种植体支持的单端悬臂修复体的临床疗效：系统回顾和meta分析

史俊宇，张晓梦，顾迎新，莫嘉骥，乔士冲，赖红昌   

  1. 上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院·口腔医学院 口腔种植科， 上海市口腔医学重点实验室，上海 200011
  • 收稿日期:2017-01-06 出版日期:2017-08-30 发布日期:2017-10-27
  • 通讯作者: 赖红昌，E-mail:lhc9@hotmail.com
  • 作者简介:史俊宇（1989-），男，硕士，E-mail: sakyamuni_jin@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金（81500892）；上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院临床研究助推计划资助项目（JYLJ011）

Marginal bone loss of implant-supported prostheses with and without cantilever - a systematic review and meta-analysis

SHI Jun-yu, ZHANG Xiao-meng, GU Ying-xin, MO Jia-ji, QIAO Shi-chong, LAI Hong-chang.   

  1. Department of Dental Implantation, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine;
    Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology. Shanghai 200011, China
  • Received:2017-01-06 Online:2017-08-30 Published:2017-10-27

PDF (PC)

485

摘要： 目的：评估种植体支持的单端悬臂修复的留存率、成功率（无并发症）和边缘骨吸收，并评价悬臂长度对种植体支持的单端悬臂修复效果影响。方法：检索截止2016年5月1日在Pubmed和Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials数据库收录的相关英文临床研究文献，从符合纳入标准的文献中提取种植体留存率、种植修复成功率和边缘骨吸收等数据并进行meta分析。结果：检索到相关的题目和摘要263条，最终纳入16篇文献。6篇文献报道了种植体支持的局部固定义齿，meta分析显示是否带有单端悬臂梁对其成功率、种植体留存率和边缘骨吸收均无显著影响。10篇文献报道了种植体支持的全口义齿，其种植体留存率为97%~100%，种植修复成功率为52%~98%，平均边缘骨吸收为0.23~1.73 mm。没有文献报道悬臂长度对种植修复有不良影响。结论：种植体支持的单端悬臂修复体是一个可预期的治疗选择。当种植体支持的局部固定义齿悬臂梁＜9 mm，种植体支持的全口义齿悬臂梁＜15.6 mm时，可以获得较好的临床疗效。

关键词: 悬臂梁, 边缘骨吸收, 临床评估, 系统回顾

Abstract: PURPOSE: The aim of the present review was to evaluate the clinical parameters and marginal bone loss of implant-supported prostheses with cantilever; and to assess the influence of cantilever length on the clinical parameters and marginal bone loss of implant-supported prostheses with cantilever. METHODS: PubMed and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched up to May 1st, 2016 for articles on implant-supported prostheses with cantilever. Meta analysis was performed for studies reporting implant success rate, implant survival rate and marginal bone loss of implant-supported prostheses with and without cantilever. RESULTS: Two hundred and sixty-three titles and abstracts were retrieved from the electronic search for possible inclusion in the review. Finally, 16 studies were included. For implant-supported fixed partially prostheses, meta analysis showed no significant differences in implant survival, success and marginal bone loss. For implant-supported full arch prostheses, 10 studies reported that survival rate ranged from 97% to 100%, success rate ranged from 52% to 98% and marginal bone loss ranged from 0.23 to 1.73 mm. No unfavorable effect of cantilever length was reported. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the current evidence, implant-supported fixed partial prostheses with cantilever could be considered as a predictable treatment option. High survival rates and acceptable marginal bone loss were reported in implant-supported full arch prostheses with cantilever. The cantilever length less than 9 mm was safe in implant-supported partial prostheses, while cantilever length less than 15.6 mm was acceptable in implant-supported full arch prostheses.

Key words: Cantilever, Marginal bone loss, Clinical evaluation, Systematic review

中图分类号: