塞来昔布用于下颌阻生牙拔除术后镇痛的疗效评价

中国口腔颌面外科杂志 ›› 2014, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (1): 65-68.

塞来昔布用于下颌阻生牙拔除术后镇痛的疗效评价

王飞^{1, *}, 宇文婷^{2, *}, 梁衍灿², 程慧琳², 焦九阳², 鲁颖娟², 陈伟良²

1.中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院麻醉科, 广东广州 510120; 2.中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院口腔科,广东广州 510120

收稿日期:2012-05-20 修回日期:2012-07-16 出版日期:2014-02-10 发布日期:2014-02-10
通讯作者: 陈伟良,E-mail:drchen@vip.163.com
作者简介:王飞(1976-),男,硕士,主治医师,E-mail：1995wangfei@sina.com；宇文婷(1983-),女,学士,医师,E-mail:yuwenting2002@163.com。*并列第一作者
基金资助:
广东省科技社会发展项目(2012B031800374)

Application of celecoxib in analgesia for patients who underwent extraction of impacted tooth

WANG Fei¹, YU Wen-ting², LIANG Yan-can², CHENG Hui-lin², JIAO Jiu-yang², LU Ying-juan², CHEN Wei-liang²

1.Department of Anaesthesiology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University. Guangzhou 510120, Guangdong Province, China; 2.Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University. Guangzhou 510120, Guangdong Province, China

Received:2012-05-20 Revised:2012-07-16 Online:2014-02-10 Published:2014-02-10
Supported by:
Supported by Science and Techology Program of Guangdong Province (2012B031800374).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的: 评价塞来昔布对下颌阻生牙拔除术后急性疼痛的镇痛效果。方法：90例拔除下颌阻生第三磨牙的患者按随机双盲法分为塞来昔布组、布洛芬组、安慰剂组,每组30例。拔牙4 h后,分别给予塞来昔布400 mg、布洛芬400 mg、维生素C 100 mg。采用视觉模拟评分法(visual analogue scale,VAS),记录患者拔牙4 h后、服药24 h内的疼痛情况及不良反应,利用SPSS 13.0软件包,通过χ²检验和方差分析,比较2种药物的镇痛效果有无显著差异。结果:塞来昔布组、布洛芬组与安慰剂组相比,在镇痛药起效时间、疼痛强度差值(PID)、疼痛缓解程度(PAR)、总疼痛强度差(SPID)、疼痛缓解总和(TOPPAR)、整体评价方面具有显著差异(P<0.05)。塞来昔布组与布洛芬组相比,镇痛效果基本相同,仅服药12 h后两者的PID有显著差异(P<0.05)。服药24 h内,在镇痛起效时间、PAR、SPID、TOPPAR、整体评价方面的差异无显著性(P>0.05)。结论：塞来昔布对下颌阻生牙拔除术后中、重度急性疼痛有明显的镇痛作用。

关键词: 塞来昔布, 阻生牙, 拔牙, 镇痛

Abstract: PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of celecoxib in acute pain relief after extraction of impacted tooth. METHODS: In the randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial, 90 patients who underwent extraction of impacted mandibular third molar, were divided into 3 groups based on the use of ccelecoxib, ibuprofen and placebo. Each group had 30 patients. After 4 hours of extraction, patients were given 400 mg celecoxib in the celecoxib group, 400 mg ibuprofen in the ibuprofen group. While in the placebo group, 100 mg vitamin C was administrated. Pain and adverse events were recorded after extraction and application of 3 drugs. Chi-square test and analysis of variance were carried out for comparison between the three groups using SPSS 13.0 software package. RESULTS: There were significant differences in analgesic onset time, PID, PAR, SPID, TOPPAR and overall assessment between celecoxib group, ibuprofen and placebo group (P<0.05). Compared with celecoxib group and ibuprofen group, the analgesic effect was quite the same. 12 h after administration, only the PID of the two groups had significant difference (P<0.05). Within 24 h, there was no significant difference in time to onset of analgesia, PAR, SPID, TOPPAR, and overall assessment (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Celecoxib has distinct analgesic effect in extraction of impacted teeth with acute severe pain.

Key words: Celecoxib, Impacted tooth, Extraction, Analgesia

王飞, 宇文婷, 梁衍灿, 程慧琳, 焦九阳, 鲁颖娟, 陈伟良. 塞来昔布用于下颌阻生牙拔除术后镇痛的疗效评价[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2014, 12(1): 65-68.

WANG Fei, YU Wen-ting, LIANG Yan-can, CHENG Hui-lin, JIAO Jiu-yang, LU Ying-juan, CHEN Wei-liang. Application of celecoxib in analgesia for patients who underwent extraction of impacted tooth[J]. China J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2014, 12(1): 65-68.

参考文献

[1] Lanas A. A review of the gastrointestinal safety data a gastroenterologist's perspective[J]. Rheumatol (Oxford), 2010, 49(Suppl 2): ii3-10.
[2] 王永, 蒋宗滨, 杨学著, 等. 塞来昔布对腹腔镜手术术后镇痛的临床研究[J]. 实用疼痛学杂志, 2007, 3(6): 431-434.
[3] 叶坪, 寇伯龙, 张斌. 塞来昔布在髋膝关节置换手术后多模式镇痛的应用[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2011, 5(3): 844-846.
[4] Kleinert R, Lange C, Steup A, et al. Single dose analgesic efficacy of tapentadol in postsurgical dental pain: the results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study[J]. Anesth Analg, 2008, 107(6): 2048-2055.
[5] Fricke J, Davis N, Yu V, et al. Lumiracoxib 400 mg compared with celecoxib 400 mg and placebo for treating pain following dental surgery: a randomized, controlled trial[J]. J Pain,2008,9(1): 20-27.
[6] Black P, Max MB, Desjardins P, et al. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison of the analgesic efficacy, onset of action, and tolerability of ibuprofen arginate and ibuprofen in postoperative dental pain[J]. Clin Ther, 2002, 24(7): 1072-1089.
[7] Gbotolorun OM, Arotiba GT, Ladeinde AL. Assessment of factors associated with surgical difficulty in impacted mandibular third molar extraction[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2007, 65(10): 1977-1983.
[8] Lago-Méndez L, Diniz-Freitas M, Senra-Rivera C, et al. Relationships between surgical difficulty and postoperative pain in lower third molar extractions[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2007, 65(5): 979-983.
[9] 魏魁杰, 赵立星. 氯诺昔康在下颌阻生智牙拔除术后镇痛中的应用[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2005, 3(2): 145-147.
[10] Becker DE. Pain management: part 1: managing acute and postoperative dental pain[J]. Anesth Prog, 2010, 57(2): 67-78.
[11] Cheung R, Krishnaswami S, Kowalski K. Analgesic efficacy of celecoxib in postoperative oral surgery pain: a single-dose, two-center, randomized, double-blind, active-and placebo-controlled study[J]. Clin Ther, 2007, 29(1): 2498-2510.
[12] Ekman EF, Wahba M, Ancona F. Analgesic efficacy of perioperative celecoxib in ambulatory arthroscopic knee surgery: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study[J]. Arthroscopy, 2006, 22(6): 635-642.
[13] Leese PT, Hubbard RC, Karim A, et al. Effects of celecoxib, a novel cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, on platelet function in healthy adults: a randomized, controlled trial[J]. J Clin Pharmacol, 2000, 40(2): 124-132.
[14] Malamed SF, Gagnon S, Leblanc D. Efficacy of articaine: a new amide local anesthetic[J]. J Am Dent Assoc,2000,131(5):635-642.

[1]	王辰昕, 彭晶, 黄昕, 施乐, 戴小锋. 柱状胶原蛋白海绵用于阻生牙拔除的效果及并发症风险分析[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2023, 21(2): 146-151.
[2]	吴烨, 刘欢欢, 陈嘉民, 牛刚, 汪涛, 谢福平, 林李嵩. 虚拟与仿真技术在下颌阻生牙拔除术实验教学中的应用[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2022, 20(3): 303-306.
[3]	胡龙威, 颜然, 文晋, 张陈平, 赵小妹, 李思毅. 127例药物性颌骨坏死患者回顾性分析：单中心10年经验总结[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2022, 20(1): 72-76.
[4]	丁作友, 朱光来, 修力军. 下颌埋伏阻生牙拔除后创口关闭与否对创口愈合的影响[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2021, 19(1): 18-21.
[5]	辛志祥, 孙璐璐, 林宇, 吕翔. 音乐疗法在90例正颌术后带管患者镇静镇痛中的效果评价[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2021, 19(1): 49-51.
[6]	常忠福, 卢立全, 姜丹丹, 张志荣, 蔡建英, 张丽华. 微创拔牙术拔除阻生智牙的临床效果及对VAS评分和应激反应的影响[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2020, 18(3): 260-263.
[7]	王丽, 张铁军, 彭伟. 不同镇静药对口腔颌面外科术后留置气管导管患者的镇静作用[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2020, 18(1): 51-55.
[8]	刘芷扬, 陈敏洁, 张伟杰, 魏文斌, 韩孜祥, 柴盈. 三维重建技术在下颌阻生第三磨牙拔除术临床教学中的应用[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2020, 18(1): 68-70.
[9]	宋勇, 李想, 蔡嫚, 王耀辉. 超声骨刀与涡轮法拔除下颌阻生第三磨牙的效果比较[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2019, 17(6): 540-544.
[10]	郑雪妮, 刘平, 刘川, 马洋, 莫静珍, 胡开进. 微创拔牙发展史[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2019, 17(6): 560-565.
[11]	李璐, 邱宇, 黄立, 蒋志豪, 王日辉, 高炳菊, 李军, 廖云阳, 林李嵩. 骨质疏松SD大鼠药物相关性颌骨骨坏死模型的建立[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2019, 17(5): 403-411.
[12]	丁凤, 吴娴, 杨细虎, 周飞军, 丁晓军. 超声骨刀微创拔牙法与传统拔牙法拔除下颌水平阻生牙的效果比较[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2019, 17(5): 431-435.
[13]	朱昊臻, 孙宇. 盐酸纳布啡超前镇痛对老年口腔颌面部肿瘤手术患者的影响[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2019, 17(4): 316-318.
[14]	白希婧, 吕东升, 周贤, 王亚楠, 杨学文. 胶原蛋白海绵用于下颌阻生牙拔除术的效果分析[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2019, 17(2): 155-158.
[15]	辛志祥, 陶智蔚, 郑永超, 吕翔. 区域神经阻滞在口腔颌面肿瘤股前外侧皮瓣修复术后镇痛中的临床应用[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2019, 17(2): 159-162.