Hard and soft tissue alterations around bone-level implants with different depths in fresh extraction sockets: a histomorphometric study

doi:10.19438/j.cjoms.2021.03.001

Abstract

Abstract: PURPOSE: To investigate the alterations of soft and hard tissue around implants with different insertion depth. METHODS: Bilateral premolars of 6 adult Labrador dogs were extracted and 24 implants were immediately placed into the extraction sockets with various insertion depths. Straumann^® Bone Level (BL) implants were positioned at 4 levels: 2 mm below, 1 mm below, flush with, and 1 mm above the alveolar crest. Six months after implant placement, all animals were sacrificed to obtain undecalcified block sections for histological analysis. Vertical bone loss and biologic width were recorded. SPSS 19.0 software package was used for data analysis. RESULTS: All implants osseointegrated uneventfully. The most significant bone resorption was observed when implants were inserted 2 mm below the buccal wall of the sockets(P<0.05). No significant difference in biologic widths was found. CONCLUSIONS: The insertion depths appeared to have influence on bone remodeling around implants in fresh extraction sockets. More pronounced vertical bone resorption was observed when implants were inserted 2 mm below the buccal alveolar ridge.

Key words: Alveolar bone remodeling, Animal model, Dental implant, Immediate placement, Insertion depth

CLC Number:

R782.1

ZHANG Chu-nan, ZHAO Xu, QIAO Shi-chong, ZHANG Xiao-meng, GU Ying-xin. Hard and soft tissue alterations around bone-level implants with different depths in fresh extraction sockets: a histomorphometric study[J]. China Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2021, 19(3): 193-196.

References

[1] Blanco J, Liñares A, Pérez J, et al.Ridge alterations following flapless immediate implant placement with or without immediate loading. part Ⅱ: a histometric study in the Beagle dog[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2011, 38(8): 762-770.
[2] Calvo-Guirado JL, Moreno GG, Aguilar-Salvatierra A, et al.Bone remodeling at implants with different configurations and placed immediately at different depth into extraction sockets. Experimental study in dogs[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2015, 26(5): 507-515.
[3] Cochran DL, Mau LP, Higginbottom FL, et al.Soft and hard tissue histologic dimensions around dental implants in the canine restored with smaller-diameter abutments: a paradigm shift in peri-implant biology[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2013, 28(2): 494-502.
[4] Negri B, López Marí M, Maté Sánchez de Val JE, et al. Biological width formation to immediate implants placed at different level in relation to the crestal bone: an experimental study in dogs[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2015, 26(7): 788-798.
[5] Valles C, Rodríguez-Ciurana X, Nart J, et al.Influence of implant neck surface and placement depth on crestal bone changes around platform-switched implants: a clinical and radiographic study in dogs[J]. J Periodontol, 2017, 88(11): 1200-1210.
[6] 邹晋阳, 谢志刚. 软硬组织美学风险及前牙即刻种植中植入深度的研究进展[J]. 医学综述, 2018, 24(5): 972-976.
[7] Calvo-Guirado JL, Moreno GG, Aguilar-Salvatierra A, et al.Bone remodeling at implants with different configurations and placed immediately at different depth into extraction sockets. Experimental study in dogs[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2014, 26(5): 507-515.
[8] Lee J, Fiorini T, Gamborena I, et al.Effect of platform shift/switch on crestal bone levels and mucosal profile following flapless surgery and crestal/subcrestal implant placement[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2016, 18(1): 73-81.
[9] Alves CC, Muñoz F, Cantalapiedra A, et al.Marginal bone and soft tissue behavior following platform switching abutment connection/disconnection-a dog model study[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2015, 26(9): 983-991.
[10] Schwarz F, Mihatovic I, Golubovich V, et al.Impact of abutment microstructure and insertion depth on crestal bone changes at nonsubmerged titanium implants with platform switch[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2015, 26(3):287-292.
[11] Hämmerle CH, Brägger U, Bürgin W, et al.The effect of subcrestal placement of the polished surface of ITI implants on marginal soft and hard tissues[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 1996, 7(2): 111-119.
[12] Chappuis V, Engel O, Shahim K, et al.Soft tissue alterations in esthetic postextraction sites: a 3-dimensional analysis[J]. J Dent Res, 2015, 94(9 Suppl): 187S-193S.

[1]	LIU Xiao-dong, ZHANG Ying, MA Jin-yu, LI Yu-zeng. Expression and significance of sclerostin in the process of alveolar bone reconstruction in type 2 diabetic rats with periodontitis [J]. China Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2023, 21(1): 19-23.
[2]	DAI Xiao-feng, HUANG Xin, LI Cheng, WANG Chen-xin, SHI Le, YU You-cheng. Comparative study on accuracy of 2 kinds of CAD/CAM dental digital guide plates in dental implantation [J]. China Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2023, 21(1): 29-35.
[3]	JIN Xia-yue, GU Yin-xin. Research progress of the effect of osteoporosis on dental implant restoration [J]. China Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2023, 21(1): 81-86.
[4]	GU Yu-wei, WANG Feng, HUANG Wei, ZHANG Zhi-yong, ZHANG Chen-ping, SUN Jian, WU Yi-qun. Long-term performance of dental implants in vascularized iliac crest grafts for mandibular reconstruction in 14 consecutive patients [J]. China Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2022, 20(5): 422-428.
[5]	GU Yu-wei, WANG Feng, HUANG Wei, ZHANG Zhi-yong, ZHANG Chen-ping, SUN Jian, WU Yi-qun. Long-term performance of dental implants in vascularized iliac crest grafts for mandibular reconstruction in 14 consecutive patients [J]. China Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2022, 20(5): 488-493.
[6]	ZHU Qing-qing, SUN Qiang, WANG Dong-ling, ZHOU Hong. Efficacy of I.lanceolatum injection on postoperative reaction following dental implant surgery [J]. China Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2022, 20(3): 230-234.
[7]	MA Jie, WANG Qi-shuai, ZHANG Bing-hua, CHEN Tian-tian, CAI Guo-ping, SONG Tao. The effect of oral implant-abutment microgaps closed by sealing materials on implant-supported prosthesis, surrounding bone [J]. China Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2022, 20(2): 117-122.
[8]	WANG Hui-li, XIE Bing, WEI Yu-hong. Effect of exogenous bFGF on osseointegration of titanium implants in type 2 diabetic rats and its possible mechanism [J]. China Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2022, 20(1): 22-27.
[9]	YANG Lu-peng, FAN Lin-feng, SHI Jun-yu, ZHANG Xiao, GU Ying-xin, ZHANG Chu-nan. Angulated screw channel restored with monolithic zirconia vs. porcelain-fused-to zirconia implant crowns: a prospective clinical trial in split-mouth design [J]. China Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2021, 19(3): 222-225.
[10]	GUO Su-wei, WANG Hong-yan, ZHAO Xiang-he. Comparison of effects between short and standard mini dental implants for mandibular overdentures [J]. China Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2021, 19(3): 253-257.
[11]	GUO Su-wei, WANG Hong-yan, ZHAO Xiang-he. Comparison of effects between short and standard mini dental implants for mandibular overdentures [J]. China Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2021, 19(3): 253-257.
[12]	LI Cheng, SHI Le. Clinical analysis of different oral biofilm materials for guided bone regeneration in dental implants [J]. China Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2020, 18(5): 438-441.
[13]	ZHANG Yi-jie, SHI Jun-yu, LAI Hong-chang. Digital impressions in implant dentistry: a literature review [J]. China Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2020, 18(5): 469-473.
[14]	WANG Ming-yi, FU Zhen, ZHANG Chen-ping. The feasibility of fibular free graft and dental implant after reconstruction of mandible with vascularized fibula flap [J]. China Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2020, 18(4): 338-342.
[15]	RUAN Dan-ping, YANG Yi-chen, DENG Si-nan, ZHAO Yuan-yuan, WU Chun-yun. The effect of preoperative prophylactic antibiotics on dental implants in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: 3-5-years retrospective study [J]. China Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2020, 18(3): 231-235.